| | Re: I was in asda at the weekend...
|
|
In lugnet.loc.uk, Scott Arthur writes: <snip> (...) [Brief pause while Stu looks up 6087 on Pause database] Aaaaaaargh! I need this set so badly, but my frivolous purchase of the Wild West set means I won't be able to splash out even that much for a (...) (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
|
| | Re: My Trading-Page
|
|
Scott, I do know, that's why I hide it behind the Mouseover (nice trick, isn't it :-) ). Do you think the company with the famous name will detect it nevertheless ? Cheers Adrian (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
|
| | Re: S@H airplanes
|
|
(...) ***HOW DID YOU KNOW?*** The S@H reps I spoke with didn't even know it was in their system unless they had already accepted an order this morning. Furthermore, they couldn't even find out how many parts the set has (LUGNET accuracy again)... (...) (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.shopping)
|
|
| | RE: AI and even more exiciting stuff
|
|
(...) [snip] (...) I wasn't them... I was involved with the control system algorithm development and analysis. This bunch was definitely not using a tool -- they were doing it all by hand. I'm sure they were not doing it right either because (...) (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
| | Re: S@H airplanes
|
|
Even better if you mentioned my name! Gotta boost that notoriety. (...) (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.shopping)
|
|
| | An actual ATAT site!
|
|
Well, it's not much to look at now, but it DOES have some more pics of my ATAT: (URL) get better with time, I swear! DaveE (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
|
| | About new minifig heads.
|
|
Has anyone ever made the minifig head with the classic smile, eyebrows, and the curly-qued mustache? In addition to being good for the fire chief, I think it would also work for "plumbers". James J. (the guy who finally beat Level 8-4's Bowser after (...) (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
|
| | Re: December Legofest / McArthur Glen
|
|
(...) Good I am glad its still on, I am planning to bring two tower sections,(both 40x40) the first is mainly grey and red and is 90% complete standing around 15 bricks high. It looks like a courtyard! and therefore I may entitle it 'Monestry' or (...) (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
|
| | Re: Jumping In...
|
|
(...) (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
|
| | Re: Wot no RCX power connector?
|
|
No, while the RCX is in an "off" state, the firmware is maintained via a trickle current (something like the CMOS registers in an personal computer) supplied by the batteries. When one removes the batteries, the firmware and any stored programs are (...) (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
| | Re: Upcoming _Star Wars_ Mindstorms and Technics Releases
|
|
Actually, SW Technic sets kind of makes sense from a marketing perspective, because it will introduce all of those Star Wars fanatics to ( possibly) a whole new branch of Lego. That is, Technic, instead of System. -Andy Lynch James Brown wrote in (...) (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
|
| | Re: Wot no RCX power connector?
|
|
(...) Wait a minute... Doesn't the RCX hold its firmware across the auto power down? I thought it did. That being the case, all you'd have to have done was turn it back on, no? -Kekoa (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
| | Re: Wot no RCX power connector?
|
|
(...) I doubt there will be significant changes to the ROM. For starters, if somebody has both an old and a new RCX, try downloading the old firmware into the new RCX. If it works, the ROM interface is the same. If the ROM interface is the same, it (...) (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
| | Re: AI and even more exiciting stuff
|
|
Ralph Hempel wrote: [ good rebuttal snipped ] (...) Actually, I went through two years of a systems engineering degree. (before finally dropping out) During that time I had many semesters worth of math and CS... however, not one of them went over (...) (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
| | RE: Busy-Bee has 6347 Monorail Accessory Track!
|
|
Hi, If anyone in the US (Tom?) has an extra one or 2 please let me know. Was off-line last week at trade shows. Figures... Thanks, Mark -----Original Message----- From: news-gateway@lugnet.com [mailto:news-gateway...net.com]On Behalf Of Ian Sinclair (...) (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Re: "Buying Lego" FAQ to link auctions to
|
|
Thanks Jamie, those are good ideas - I'll add them. Kevin (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
|
| | Re: Wot no RCX power connector?
|
|
What new pieces are there in the RIS 1.5? I don't suppose maybe a second differential gear? No, probably not... Was there anything really glaringly useful? -Andy Lynch Mike Kory wrote in message ... (...) (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
| | Re: Propeller
|
|
(...) There are also the 3 blade propellers used in the various adventurers airplanes, plus the 3 bladed propeller used on the Rock Raiders Tunnel Transport. The 3 bladed adventurers propeller would probably look the best for boat useage. There's (...) (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.boats)
|
|
| | Re: Object Orientation & DAT files & CLIPPING/WINDING
|
|
(...) <snipped stuff about INVERT> I think we're disagreeing about the meaning of 'strictly local'. As you describe the operation of INVERT, it is *not* local. The state of inversion is passed down the file-reference tree. This is not a local (...) (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Object Orientation & DAT files & CLIPPING/WINDING
|
|
Rui Martins wrote in message ... (...) I concur that WINDING is strictly local. It may be a struggle of words, but I wouldn't call INVERT *local* as it affects the behaviour all tris/quads in *subfiles* And I don't see why clipping should be local. (...) (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|