 | | Re: 3D geometry question
|
|
(...) Sure. But to picture the vector as starting in the origin makes it easier to understand what I want in the paragraph below: (...) In fact, for my application, any of these solutions would suffice. (...) I think we also need some constraints on (...) (25 years ago, 13-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Track parts naming scheme survey
|
|
Adviesbureau Noord/Zuidlijn wrote: <snipped it again!> Except I think you forgot the sleeper, or else I missed it. it's neither 12v or 4.5v so it ought to be Train Track Sleeper or Train Track Slotted Sleeper but I'm not sure which. (25 years ago, 13-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Track parts naming scheme survey
|
|
Yes! Excellent compromise! It's got the key stuff up front and the fact that not all parts are 4.5v specific or 9v specific comes out clearly. Adviesbureau Noord/Zuidlijn wrote: <very nice work, all of which I snipped> (...) I'll say! :-) Now say (...) (25 years ago, 13-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: General Box #3 ("minneapolis box")
|
|
(...) These are "armless faceless" minifig bodies, missing their heads. Quite old (mid 70s??). Gary I. has a bunch which he has (1) used for architectural accents. Here's a set that has them: "texas rangers" (URL) (1) Now before you think I'm (...) (25 years ago, 13-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| |
| | Re: Upcoming _Star Wars_ Mindstorms and Technics Releases
|
|
My guess is that there´ll be a Slave I because: - it´s got a good size to be build as a modell (well a smaller scaled version) - we need more of the bad guys. One TIE is not enough for playing Star Wars - it looks cool, so it´ll sell good - we´ve (...) (25 years ago, 13-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.technic)
|
