 | | Re: LEGO® R2-D2™ UCS Set #10225
|
|
(...) Since the video (for now) is private on LEGOClubTV channel. Try this (URL) YouTube> link. Not as sharp as the LEGOClubTV channel. I hope this helps. (13 years ago, 13-Mar-12, to lugnet.starwars, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO R2-D2 UCS Set #10225
|
|
(...) Maybe it shows R2 in the nude. (13 years ago, 13-Mar-12, to lugnet.starwars, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO R2-D2 UCS Set #10225
|
|
(...) David (13 years ago, 13-Mar-12, to lugnet.starwars, FTX)
|
| |
| | LEGO® R2-D2™ UCS Set #10225
|
|
2012 Ultimate Collector Series R2-D2™ #10225 YouTube.com (URL) LEGOClubTV> Video: 3:53 (URL) YouTube Channel information: Come with us as we take an exclusive look at the never before seen 10225 R2-D2™, the latest exclusive LEGO® Star Wars™ set! (...) (13 years ago, 13-Mar-12, to lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: CAD Animation of OBB Classic Space Layout...
|
|
(...) I like the swooshing through the monorail supports. AND that you built them partly using newer parts and partly old... I take it the camera was flying the same path as the ship it was following? Nice work. ++Lar (13 years ago, 13-Mar-12, to lugnet.org.ca.obb)
|
| |
| | Re: Mathematical proof that you can't build anything with LEGO bricks
|
|
(...) I'm pretty sure we've agreed many times in the past where there was a common enemy. But it's much more fun arguing so those are what are remembered ;) (13 years ago, 13-Mar-12, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Mathematical proof that you can't build anything with LEGO bricks
|
|
(...) I remember a time when my collection fit into a cardboard box k, i was still single digits at the time Dave (13 years ago, 13-Mar-12, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Mathematical proof that you can't build anything with LEGO bricks
|
|
(...) I suppose that I can accept that as a fitting compromise. Wow. This might be the first time that we agreed on something. (13 years ago, 13-Mar-12, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Mathematical proof that you can't build anything with LEGO bricks
|
|
(...) LOL. If that poor kid's collection can fit in the cupboard, then he obviously doesn't have enough. (13 years ago, 13-Mar-12, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Mathematical proof that you can't build anything with LEGO bricks
|
|
--snip-- (...) "Mum! They have LEGO!" "Don't you have enough LEGO already?" "All my LEGO is in the cupboard." Fixed! (13 years ago, 13-Mar-12, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Mathematical proof that you can't build anything with LEGO bricks
|
|
--snip-- (...) Oh I'm not taking it seriously at all ;) But I will fight for the linguistic differences between us and them (defined as the situation calls for). I have never heard, outside of TV and my recent trip to the US, the bricks referred to (...) (13 years ago, 13-Mar-12, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | CAD Animation of OBB Classic Space Layout...
|
|
'cause I don't have enuf to keep me occupied, I decided to throw some animation in the virtual space layout-- (URL) latest iteration-- (URL) all movement, including the camera view, are hard-coded (x,y,z co-ordinates) into POV-Ray and then rendered (...) (13 years ago, 13-Mar-12, to lugnet.org.ca.obb, lugnet.loc.ca.on, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto) !
|
| |
| | Re: Alt Bricks
|
|
(...) When in doubt, one should always try removing the thumb! (URL) Nice clone bricks Steve. ROSCO (13 years ago, 13-Mar-12, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Mathematical proof that you can't build anything with LEGO bricks
|
|
(...) And here I was wondering how you did that nifty bullet point. How about this: Of the English-speaking population that might reasonably be anticipated to pluralize a word by adding an S on the end of it, nearly 100% of non-AFOLs use the term (...) (13 years ago, 12-Mar-12, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Mathematical proof that you can't build anything with LEGO bricks
|
|
(...) That * was actually an *ahem* but FTX ate the rest. Sounds harsher without it. Ignore the word 'fans'. Very few non-AFOLs here or in Europe would call them LEGOs. Ergo not even close to 100%. (13 years ago, 12-Mar-12, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Mathematical proof that you can't build anything with LEGO bricks
|
|
(...) If the author is worried about maximum variation with minimal parts... go play with Silly-Putty. LEGO is not, at the heart, about combinatorics, it's about creations. Perhaps he should do more building and less math. Or, visit a convention (...) (13 years ago, 12-Mar-12, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts not made by lego - 3D printed Bricks
|
|
(...) Good point. (...) Cool! Play well, Jacob (10 URLs) (13 years ago, 12-Mar-12, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Mathematical proof that you can't build anything with LEGO bricks
|
|
(...) A fair point, I suppose, though I maintain that since I was referring to "non AFOLs," I'm not sure that it's relevant. (13 years ago, 12-Mar-12, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Mathematical proof that you can't build anything with LEGO bricks
|
|
--snip-- (...) no. Nowhere near 100%. There's a very high fraction of LEGO fans outside North America. (13 years ago, 12-Mar-12, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Parts not made by lego - 3D printed Bricks
|
|
Based on an earlier post, I thought I would have another try at custom Lego bricks. Studs are hard. Clutch power is good. Fun to experiment. Someone who shall remain namless thinks this might be a cool way to make old parts no longer made. I (...) (13 years ago, 11-Mar-12, to lugnet.general)
|
