 | | Re: Museo Zagarolo: elenco teche
|
|
(...) Sono in cm, il problema è che non c'è teca che contiene o campanile o fabbrica, ah ah. Vediamo Ciao (17 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.org.it.itlug)
|
| |
| | Re: Evento al Museo di Zagarolo
|
|
(...) Ciao a tutti, sono lieto anch'io di fare parte di questa esperienza che sarà sicuramente esaltante. Approfitto per citare che Zagarolo si trova ad una decina di chilometri da Castel San Pietro Romano, un ridente paesino in cima ad una collina (...) (17 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.org.it.itlug)
|
| |
| | Re: Power Functions presentation
|
|
(...) Hello David, It is OK (driver IC is thermally protected), but not recommanded. Only one XL motor can absorb more current than the dirver inside IR receiver is able to provide (800mA)... But why not if they are lightly loaded. There are some (...) (17 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | info set 4954-Town House
|
|
a Torino ho visto la casa 4954. volevo avere alcune info. 1) all'interno è vuota, ovvero non ha il primo piano? 2) dato che ho preso degli slope invertiti di colore tan (mi pare che sia di questo colore la casa), se volessi realizzare il pavimento (...) (17 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.org.it.itlug)
|
| |
| | Re: Museo Zagarolo: cosa portare
|
|
Alcune riflessioni su cosa portare a Zagarolo. Set LEGO: Fondamentale esporre set LEGO originali con le loro scatole, qualche catalogo, qualche istruzione. Anni '60, '70, '80, '90 e presente. Quante per ogni epoca? 3-4 set non di più. In pratica una (...) (17 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.org.it.itlug)
|
| |
| | Re: Museo Zagarolo: elenco teche
|
|
(...) Ma le dimensioni sono in mm o cm? In mm sarebbero un po' piccole, in cm decisamente grandi! Ciao RoscoPC (17 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.org.it.itlug)
|
| |
| | Re: Museo Zagarolo: elenco teche
|
|
Ho letto la relazione di Marco e visto le foto al che ..... mi sono tremati i polsi !!! Ho pensato che dobbiamo mettere in piedi una cosa GROSSA in POCO TEMPO. Ho pensato ad alcune cose che di seguito espongo : - la necessità di uno o più (...) (17 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.org.it.itlug)
|
| |
| | Re: What would YOU like to see from TECHNIC?
|
|
(...) I'll second this request for something other than vehicles. There are heaps of interesting machines out there that don't have wheels. Personally I've always wanted a working Lego Jacquard Loom. (...) Hear hear! Cheers Tim. (17 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Opinions sought on rendering method
|
|
Well, as of 0135 PDT, lugnet.cad.ray is at the top of the 24-hour column of the LUGNET Traffic Report (with 18 posts, vs. 12 for the next group). That makes me feel good. :-) (This is the only thread in the group that has had any posts in the last (...) (17 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Opinions sought on rendering method
|
|
(...) OK, I played around with this tonight for a few hours, and finally came up with something that I think I'm happy with. It requires 3 passes of the transparent polygons (just during snapshot save with SaveAlpha enabled), but it seems to get (...) (17 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Future of Trains
|
|
(...) You are right, the main limitation probably comes from wall wart... You are essentially right for the 0.7A current (though it is not hard limit, rather a safety one). Philo (17 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.robotics.nxt, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Opinions sought on rendering method
|
|
(...) To me, the reasons are mainly "historical": the first way to get better images than the output of Ldraw/MLCad/LeoCAD (which is not that bad for instructions!) was POV-Ray. L3PAO then LPub did a lot to push POV as the renderer of choice. Add to (...) (17 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: What would YOU like to see from TECHNIC?
|
|
Here are a few of my ideas: robotic arm (advanced version of set #8094) carnival rides (set #4957 is a good start) areal cable car (similar to the one in idea book #8889) remote controlled hovercraft (could be moving around on wheels) airplane with (...) (17 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Opinions sought on rendering method
|
|
(...) A very important point - I didn't even noticed that the vehicle roof was grey, not white! (...) That's the main problem of LDD generated instructions: no edges... Philo (17 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: What would YOU like to see from TECHNIC?
|
|
(...) Hi Kelly, thanks for dropping in. I didn't vote becasue i would buy anything. I deliberate on aspects such as parts and colour availability but the end result is a purchase. Even if it contains blue axle pins. I think you should produce all (...) (17 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: ARM Assembly Language Programming on NXT?
|
|
(...) Thanks for the tip. I glanced at (URL) previously but I must've missed it thinking it's Java based. (...) Are you referring to the default NXT firmware or the LEJOS NXJ/OSEK firmware? (...) You're right, I've come across several ARM-based SBC (...) (17 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt.nxthacking)
|
| |
| | Re: Opinions sought on rendering method
|
|
(...) It'll be there in the next release. (...) Actually, if you look you will see that parts of it are somewhat transparent (like the left edge of the windscreen). All of it that has the background visible through transparent parts is supposed to (...) (17 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
|
| |
| | peeron inventory corrections
|
|
Oct 8 1786-1: Jailbreak Joe 4865 Black Panel 1 x 2 x 1 should be 0 not 2 4865 TrLtBlue Panel 1 x 2 x 1 should be 0 not 1 missing from the inventory: 4864a Panel 1x2x2 with Solid Studs Black/2 Trlite Blue/1 3176 Plate 3x2 with Hole Black/1 3666 White (...) (17 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: Five micro skyscrapers
|
|
I really like how you built the (URL) St. Louis Arch> with all regular slopes. It's a pity that LEGO has never made a 65° inverted slope. David (17 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.build, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Opinions sought on rendering method
|
|
(...) I would choose LDView over POV-Ray and L3P in an instant if the -SaveAlpha option worked on my Mac. Otherwise, I think your conclusions about the appearance settings are correct. LDView renderings like your example look great. Would it make (...) (17 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
|
