 | | Re: LEGO 9V Train Communication
|
|
Nessun commento? Nessuna lamentela? Percui a Itlug non interessano più i treni? Forza ragazzi che abbiamo bisogno di feedback dall'Italia!! Ciao Marco (18 years ago, 3-Oct-07, to lugnet.org.it.itlug)
|
| |
| | Re: The Future of Trains
|
|
(...) I can only speak for myself, but part of the fun, for me at least, is the challenge of staying within the confines of the Lego product. If I wanted to build track, etc. from other items, or do my own molding, I'd work in N or HO scale (...) (18 years ago, 3-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Future of Trains
|
|
(...) Now that is kind of what I was advocating in my post. The whole LEGO system is a modular system--why not come up with modular way of creating tracks and motor housings or whatever using perhaps the system as the glue and outside parts as part (...) (18 years ago, 3-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Future of Trains
|
|
(...) If you go far enough north it isn't! They also use the other variant, youse guyses, as in, "You got da deep snow over to youse guyses place, eh?" to which the response would be, "Ya, sure, but we cleared da path to da sauna!" (18 years ago, 3-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: The Future of Trains
|
|
(...) Yes, I am aware that "y'all" does have some connotations--but have decided that it is really the only politically correct, all encompassing, non-gender, non-racial, non-religious specfic pronoun that is available in the English language-at (...) (18 years ago, 3-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | New Mecha
|
|
Hello all, Here's my newest mecha I call it the Phalanx. (URL) you like it -Jon (18 years ago, 3-Oct-07, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.announce.moc) !
|
| |
| | LegoShop Purchases Earn 5% Cash-back from Discover
|
|
FYI, my credit card statement said that Discover Card holders can now get a 5% cash-back bonus on Lego purchases initiated from a link on their site. A similar deal exists for online purchases from Target.com (which also sells Lego). Here is the (...) (18 years ago, 3-Oct-07, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Spyshot: 18 wide Trolley
|
|
(URL) I've wanted to build this ever since (URL) this> element came out.... Started it last year, and it's still not finished. Sorry about the crummy pic-- really bad lighting, and I got a little crazy with Photoshop, too:-p So just one pic for now; (...) (18 years ago, 3-Oct-07, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Sydney LEGO Train Club
|
|
G'day everyone! Last weekend, the Sydney LEGO Train Club (SLTC) had a very successful showing at the 2007 Annual Australian Model Railway Association (NSW) Exhibition. (URL) LEGO Train Club (SLTC) at 2007 AMRA (NSW) Exhibition>> For those (...) (18 years ago, 3-Oct-07, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.trains, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
|
(...) Well, to be perfectly honest, while I'm pretty confident that LDView can be gotten to work relatively easily (via xvfb) on the LDraw server, I'm not sure whether its performance will be "acceptable". So I think it's only fair to keep the (...) (18 years ago, 3-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: R22 - swinging bots
|
|
Complete suckage! I've built three variations, and they just fail around. My (wishfully) brilliant idea of asymetric CG displacement turned out to be a flop. Anyone else manage this yet? -Rob A> (18 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: The Future of Trains
|
|
(...) If this were to be done, and the target market was AFOLs, then it would make far more sense to not bother at all with the curved and straight track sections of different sizes, but just produce flextrack. Then you have a single small gang-able (...) (18 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: The Future of Trains
|
|
(...) ah, forgive me. I've never actually seen any 12v stuff :( I was just trying to throw out an example so, whoops. The track will all work together still like the current plastic track works still with metal track. the main difference is where (...) (18 years ago, 3-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: The Future of Trains
|
|
(...) The topic of battery life and pulling power came up today - (URL) click here> for that thread. Hopefully it can address some of your concerns. (URL) (18 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.trains, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: The Future of Trains
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Didier Enjary wrote: SNIP (...) Ironically, in the UK, when the (US) Winsconsin Central took over the main freight operator, EWS, they reduced the use of electric locos, presumably because they couldn't get their heads round using (...) (18 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Future of Trains
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Martin Srb wrote: SNIP (...) The (URL) Tim (18 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Next meeting on Saturday October 13, 2007
|
|
Posted on behalf of Dan Jassim: ---...--- Hi all, I am scheduling LUGOLA meetings from now through 2008 as: October 13, 2007 November 10, 2007 December 8, 2007 Meetings shall be held MONTHLY every 2nd Saturday from 11:00 a.m.-2:00 p.m., with the (...) (18 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.la)
|
| |
| | Ultra Sonic Super Fantastic Kids Day Weekend 2007!
|
|
Hello fellow LEGO Fans! Please join us for the: Ultra Sonic Super Fantastic Kids Day Weekend 2007! ==== PNC Arts Center - Holmdel, New Jersey. EXIT 116 on the Garden State Parkway. FREE FREE FREE FREE FREE FREE FREE (4 URLs) October 6th - 11am to (...) (18 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.events, lugnet.space, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.trains, lugnet.org.us.gardenslug, FTX)
|
| |
| | vendo 10076
|
|
ciao a qualcuno possono interessare un paio di (URL) (18 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.org.it.itlug.market)
|
| |
| | Re: Introducing Lic - Lego Instruction Creator (pre-alpha)
|
|
(...) Hi Remi, Maybe you didn't know but I am working on a WYSIWYG version of LPub, where there is no manual editing of the LDraw file. So far, almost everything has GUI point and click kind of interface with support for multiple steps per page, and (...) (18 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Future of Trains
|
|
(...) Well the versions I have seen most recently are directly powering lamps and light fixtures and such. I don't know if that would be enough for a train motor. I doubt LEGO has that in the works too, but it would be nice. Reliance on batteries is (...) (18 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Future of Trains
|
|
(...) Hm, I wonder if TLG would fight them on a patent/design methodology? That would be the first issue I see. However, on that note, what I would really like to see is some way to get just metal tracks that would fit over the plastic track. That (...) (18 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: The Future of Trains
|
|
(...) SNIP (...) In France nowadays (and most part of Europe), almost all freight engines are electric. (thank to a highly available hydroelectricity and nuclear electricity). It remains of course some diesel engines but they are replaced for (...) (18 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Future of Trains
|
|
(...) Hehe, so I'm not alone on that one :-) (...) A guy in the Netherlands is just trying this, even before this message of discontinuation of the 9V line appeared. (...) About 5 years ago, I even started with Lego trains that were discontinued 23 (...) (18 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Future of Trains
|
|
(...) Ben, Well said! I couldn't have stated it any better. I too will wait, impatiently I might add, for the reveal on the new system. I trust that if I lack the creativity to make it work, I will do what I always do... Copy from the rest of you. (...) (18 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: The Future of Trains
|
|
(...) Well I do. The last 5 years I have build up a huge collection of blue track (both 12 volt and 4.5 volt), as well as trains from that era (1966-1979) and many parts, like motors, train bases, etc. All long after the last production run by TLC (...) (18 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: The Future of Trains
|
|
(...) Funny how we as AFOLs have a hard time thinking "outside the box". We automatically assume that new track geometry necessarily requires large sectional track pieces. The old 4.5-volt/12-volt system had separate ties (sleepers in Europe), track (...) (18 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Future of Trains
|
|
(...) Hey Adam, Will you sell me you 9v stuff? Todd (18 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: The Future of Trains
|
|
(...) Two-pole contact is needed. But most of the electrified railways use only one overhead wire (like the ex-Soviet loco in the photo). The only examples of more-wire systems I know about, are deep in the history: --Siemens' experimental (...) (18 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Future of Trains
|
|
(...) Also, Add Consumer Products Safety Commission (CPSC) rules that anything using AC power means minimum age 7 on the box, and with Duplo going around age 5, that means a gap in trains from age 5 to 7. The new battery train has a lower age range (...) (18 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: The Future of Trains
|
|
(...) The only issue with this is that standard catenary has a single wire to deliver current, and metal rails act as the "ground" for the circuit. One could instead adopt a setup like that used for electric buses in cities such as San Francisco, (...) (18 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
|
(...) Hmm. I should put my color patch .DAT file on the server somewhere... (...) That could be changed. But I think most people who profess a preference prefer the black edges, rather than colored edges. We could soften the black edges to a (...) (18 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Helicopter Trainer
|
|
(...) Oops, I forgot to add this (URL) (18 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: The Future of Trains
|
|
(...) This reminds me - has anyone built a fully functioning overhead rail electric train layout where the power is provided by the overhead wires like this: (URL) This would alleviate the need for powered rails and do away with the battery issue. (...) (18 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Helicopter Trainer
|
|
Just a quick note to let you know about my modified 8485 Helicopter. This includes an extra turntable so that the aircraft can rotate whilst hovering. I have also added a trainer seat with the foot pedals and joystick controlling the helicopters (...) (18 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: RailBricks Issue 1
|
|
(...) Wow - I love the idea of using caterpillar/tank type track pieces for the sides of modern American car carriers as seen on page 31!! :-O If I still had a train layout, I would borrow that design and go on a spending spree on Blink to build at (...) (18 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
|
(...) Yes, but wouldn't that be subverting Willy's diabolical plan to render everything with ldview? ;^) Don (18 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
|
(...) I don't have a test case for all the colors, but the ones I did try look ok now. (...) It all looks odd to me with the black edge lines on all the bricks. Good for printed instructions, but not as pretty on screen. Oh well. I suppose it (...) (18 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
|
(...) I could probably whip up a program that does the conversion fairly quickly (hour or two of work?) if you're interested. I have the advantage that I already have a full parser for ldconfig.ldr. Spitting out the ldliterc.dat file should be (...) (18 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
|
(...) Yeah we experimented with xvfb many years ago. (URL) was some weirdness with the aspect ratio that was probably caused by a bug in ldglite at the time. And there were some questions about large image sizes, but it should be a viable solution (...) (18 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
