|
|
 | | Re: There's a reason steam engines use a flywheel...
|
| (...) You might consider using the LEGO magnet bricks (URL). They've got a good mass to them, and they're two studs wide. I can think of a couple different ways to fashion them into a round configuration: 1. studs facing in or out - with technic (...) (20 years ago, 25-Oct-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | MOC: "Retro Factory" Motorail Terminal
|
| Hi all, I've been working to recreate some of the great classic town/train sets within the bounds imposed by the piece assortment on LDD. The Motorail Terminal is, I think, one of the more impressive results of this project. And I've produced a (...) (20 years ago, 25-Oct-06, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad.ldd, lugnet.announce.moc, FTX) !!
| | | | | Re: Speaking of Canadian
|
| (...) I'm not all pro-TLC. (...) So I do (...) Sure. I totally agree, and my goal was just to inform ("modifier" is not the term originally used by TLC, the right term being "adjective") and not, in any way, to be pedantic or polemic. Regards, (...) (20 years ago, 25-Oct-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Brooklyn's Engine 226
|
| (...) Thanks. I have been to your maj.com folders quite a few times. I had noticed that fire station in there before as well. I just love the bay doors. I have a few ideas in mind for my next series of buildings as well as adding a few more diners (...) (20 years ago, 25-Oct-06, to lugnet.town, FTX)
| | | | | Re: There's a reason steam engines use a flywheel...
|
| In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Rob Antonishen wrote: <snip> (...) Thanks for the info, guys! I'll play around with some ideas--aat this time, the design dictates that the flywheel has to be 2 studs wide. I might go with multiple smaller flywheels (...) (20 years ago, 25-Oct-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Speaking of Canadian
|
| (...) Yes, I have been told by the great Jake McKee that lego should be written in all caps. Derek Oops, that should be "LEGO" (20 years ago, 25-Oct-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Speaking of Canadian
|
| (...) I'm all pro-TLC, but a company does not have the right to dictate how people speak. I type LEGO bricks and LEGO creations (for the most part), 'cause I appreciate the brick. That said, it's not grammatically wrong for my nephew to say (or (...) (20 years ago, 25-Oct-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Speaking of Canadian
|
| (...) Thanks. (20 years ago, 25-Oct-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Speaking of Canadian
|
| (...) Hi, (...) You can check this document : (URL) precisely, I quote : If the LEGO trademark is used at all, it should always be used as an adjective, not as a noun. For example, say "MODELS BUILT OF LEGO BRICKS". Never say "MODELS BUILT OF (...) (20 years ago, 25-Oct-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Speaking of Canadian
|
| (...) The Lego company asks that we use 'Lego' as a modifier, as in 'Lego piece' or 'Lego set'. Instead of "look at my lego sculpture', 'or sculpture made of Legos' one should say 'look at my sculpture made of Lego parts'. This supposedly will keep (...) (20 years ago, 25-Oct-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Skipped 2 messages in
group
lugnet.off-topic.debate (Skip-filter settings)
|
