 | | Re: Nugator.com - New Lego Retail Super Site
|
|
(...) I think the idea is that it is a monthly fee, not yearly; hence, if you wished to get a discount on something, or just wanted to be part of a contest than ran for a month or two, you'd have to pay the $5.00 fee for that month. Also, if it is (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.market.shopping)
|
| |
| | Re: FA : SOCCER SETS AND SUB-SETS (all new misp/misb)
|
|
Last week I had a bidder with a rating of -1. That did worry me, I must admit. Then after a day or so he got some feed back, so his rating was boosted to zero. He was outbid in the end. -- Scott A Edinburgh, Scotland. (URL) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
| | 3011 Duplo Brick 2 x 4 [DAT]
|
|
0 Duplo Brick 2 x 4 0 Name 3011.dat 0 Author: Steve Bliss 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Un-Official Part 1 16 40 4 0 2 0 0 0 -9.5 0 0 0 2 stud4.dat 1 16 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 -9.5 0 0 0 2 stud4.dat 1 16 -40 4 0 2 0 0 0 -9.5 0 0 0 2 stud4.dat 1 16 0 48 0 76 0 0 (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 3437 Duplo Brick 2 x 2 [DAT]
|
|
The Duplo Terror has begun! <gg> 0 Duplo Brick 2 x 2 0 Name 3437.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Un-Official Element 1 16 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 -9.5 0 0 0 2 stud4.dat 1 16 0 48 0 36 0 0 0 -44 0 0 0 36 box5.dat 4 16 40 48 40 36 48 36 -36 48 36 -40 48 40 4 16 (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
|
(...) The more I think about it, I think a simple letter would do. But first I think we should experiment a bit with different logos and present them printed on the letter so they can review them right there and state their preference. Once I get (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
|
(...) On the small logos it probably would not work, so another solution would have to be devised for that. (...) I'd prefer to keep it red. I don't think a wireframe fade would be considered under TLG's trade dress if a squabble arose. (...) I (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: FA : SOCCER SETS AND SUB-SETS (all new misp/misb)
|
|
(...) So am I...to a point...$40 for empty boxes...I'd start having my doubts. Unfortunately, I've been left hanging more than a few times by those with no feedback. Good luck to you. Julie He/she is (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
|
(...) Well, if we were to contact TLG, what would be the best approach to it, to get on their good side? I'm not totally objected to contacting them, I just would like to make sure we've done everything we can to have them not jump on us beforehand. (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Box Progress
|
|
(...) The only reason I thought each box should have a received/log/mailed thread of its own was to help Tamy. I know she's back at school and I thought it would be less time consuming for her to check to see who wants to be added if we keep the (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| |
| | Re: FA : SOCCER SETS AND SUB-SETS (all new misp/misb)
|
|
Also for the record, Scott had appended his eBay posting to explicitly state the boxes are empty *before* anyone here pointed out the possibly misleading description. And Scott, sorry if my first contribution to this thread sounded accusatory - I (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
