 | | Re: Pneumatic Switch
|
|
(...) two? I think there has been a few directory shuffles at the web site... very sorry about that. This is the index page of pictures of a few of my things. This should work... I have not been experienceing any problems. (URL) Victorian Lego Group (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: How much for a 6036?
|
|
Arjan Brugman wrote in message <01bee812$9e247f80$d...efault>... (...) <37B84944.3C697F@wor...tt.net>... (...) me! (...) to open it yet. (...) bids. (...) (as I told my (...) rid (...) aren't (...) do like the (...) people! (...) I probably have (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Give me strength...
|
|
Markassius wrote in message ... (...) You got the number right, Mark. That is a cool set - I got it in a large lot (of which I said I would sell the non-Castle sets) and still haven't been able to let it go. -- Have fun! John AUCTION Page (More (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
Be sure to include in your 8448 review: "...truly inspired by the 956, but built with the structural nuances of the 8480 Space Shuttle. Definately not another 8880, but strangely that's a plus." KL (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: Question from a newbie
|
|
Hi Craig, Welcome and thanks for posting! Craig Livingston <CLivin007@aol.com> wrote in message news:FGL6HI.JpL@lugnet.com... (...) legos. (...) the (...) and (...) brick-naming (...) nomenclature (...) Yes you did come to the right place (I think (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: 8448 ramblings
|
|
Well, since I diddn't buy any 98 Technic sets, I guess that explains my ignorance. Of course I'm always wrong about new parts anyway :) KL (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts for LDraw or parts for POV-Ray?
|
|
(...) Both l2p and l3p have their advantages depending on the goal of the user. l3p is great if you want a rendered version of a model, no matter the parts. l2p is great if you want a more detailed/smooth render and the parts are available. Thanks (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Sith Infiltrator now $15.99 at ShopKo
|
|
This week the Naboo Fighter and Snowspeeder are $15.99. Plus, they have marked the Sith Infiltrator to $15.99 also. This time the register rang up correctly at that price. No more having to show the cashier the ad like a few weeks ago when it was (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.market.shopping)
|
| |
| | Re: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET
|
|
(...) No no no my friend. You cannot say in the least that your post was not rude or that it was cancelled out in effect by Tore's kind reply. Just because Tore himself didn't react at you doesn't mean it was rude. Posting mishaps happen, and (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New Applicator MOCs at Joe's Lego Page (love those tracks)
|
|
(...) Deere and Caterpillar do use tracks on some of their tractors. For older tractors, they offer kits that bolt on in place of the existing hub and tire. Since they use gear boxes to transfer the power from the axles to the track sprockets, they (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.build, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | I apologize
|
|
I apologize to everyone I have annoyed, flamed, pissed off or offended. I am sorry for saying things like: Where can I get xyz Can someone please make me xyz How do i make xyz Has anyone made xyz I need xyz Here is my attempt at xyz, is there (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: IR tower near/far swtich on Mac G3
|
|
(...) The warning in the NQC doc is more historical than anything else. When NQC was first being tested I got some reports of problems in far mode that went away in near mode (LED was being overdriven in far mode). However, as the user base (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET
|
|
(...) He actually took the time to answer my questions, therefore he does not consider the post rude and since it was meant only for his eyes that means that the opinions of the rest of the group as to the rudeness of the post do not matter as the (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: 6056 - Brick 2 x 2 x 6 with Groove
|
|
hi Joshua, (...) Oh... I hope not. My sets have gone to the four corners of my storage area. Not many are still in their original boxes, and it would probably take me eons to figure out which one some pieces came from. Yikes, I hate the thought of (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: set containing 2x2x2 slopes?
|
|
Eric McCarthy wrote in message <37B89B34.13DA@aol.com>... (...) 8232 Technic Chopper Force has (2) Red -Rob Doucette. (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Empty Lego Boxes (FREE)
|
|
In lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf, Michael Mierzwa writes: I (...) I could pick them up next Monday, as I'll be in Walnut Creek all day and night loading a musical into the Regional Center for the Arts. Is there any way you could leave them with the person you (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf)
|
| |
| | Re: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET
|
|
(...) mail folder I did) And that makes it OK? It was still extremely rude whether you sent it to Tore or posted it. It showed no respect for Tore at all. Eric Remove ".nospam" when replying by E-mail. The New England LEGO Users Group (URL) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Pause Links
|
|
I did find out what page it is on. lugnet.publish Scott "Yes, I did answer my own e-mail post" Sanburn (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Please move this discussion to lugnet.admin.general (was: CFV: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET)
|
|
(...) Oops! Adam, the 'Followup-To' header needs to be part of the message header, not the body of the message. (...) The above message should have been posted with the 'Followup-To' header set to a lugnet.admin.general. (But don't get mad at Adam; (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Question from a newbie
|
|
I really don't know if this is right place to post this, but here goes: Since coming out of my own dark ages, I have really gotten involved in legos. I enjoy reading lugnet.com's newsgroups, but often I am unable to decipher the meaning of a brick (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
