Subject:
|
Re: Parts for LDraw or parts for POV-Ray?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 17 Aug 1999 02:41:14 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
bingle@ibm.net*avoidspam*
|
Viewed:
|
1085 times
|
| |
|
|
> Of course it is hard to give up something you created on your own.
> I spent thousands of hours designing the parts, and still do when
> I have the time to. Unfortunately this is not much at these months.
> There are about 40 or 50 new parts waiting to be released, and all
> the renumbering to be included in L2P, I hope to manage this by end
> of August. Sometimes otherwise I fear that nobody is interested in
> L2P anymore, since L3P can handle all parts theroretically when the
> come out, even unofficial ones, this is an advantage of course.
Both l2p and l3p have their advantages depending on the goal of the user. l3p
is great if you want a rendered version of a model, no matter the parts. l2p is
great if you want a more detailed/smooth render and the parts are available.
Thanks for giving us the option!
Rich Bingle
bingle@ibm.net
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Parts for LDraw or parts for POV-Ray?
|
| (...) First to make clear: L2P uses a library of parts, about 630 by the latest update L3P uses LDraw parts and converts them directly, as I know, so with L3P you can get all parts which are in your parts-directory. So the discussion shlul be about (...) (25 years ago, 16-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
146 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
