| | Re: New Applicator MOCs at Joe's Lego Page (love those tracks)
|
|
Joe rocks out another amazing doozie. For farm equipment, there's no one finer. Are these triangular wheel/track assemblies for real? They sure LOOK cool. (...) I just have one question, is a concept spreader something one uses to get ideas (...) (25 years ago, 15-Aug-99, to lugnet.build, lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: i admit i was wrong
|
|
(...) Whoops! There are two #5's up there, eh? :o) By the second #5, I really meant the lugnet.starwars group in particular, although other people may have discovered other areas of related concern, disgust, or disappointment. For instance, there's (...) (25 years ago, 15-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
| | Re: Give me strength...
|
|
I have two sets which I could probably make money on, but they are just too cool. It's the Launch Command Plane with the shuttle on it. The number...Oh, I don't know! Oh wait, I remember now! :) (URL) to have cool sets like this again! Scott Sanburn (...) (25 years ago, 15-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: i admit i was wrong
|
|
(...) <snipped good "Dear Jon" letter> Many good points, said in a good way. Unfortunately, I think it's all a bit too late. All these points have been mentioned before by several folks for awhile now. But thanks for saying them anyway. And welcome (...) (25 years ago, 15-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Which set is the infamous Forest Wench in?
|
|
Todd, Thanks for posting that, I have been looking for the page with the search box for a long time! :) Scott Sanburn (...) (25 years ago, 15-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: New Applicator MOCs at Joe's Lego Page (love those tracks)
|
|
Some more of Joe's great work. I always enjoy the farm equipment look-alikes. This is something new. Joe is creating his own machines. Look out John Deer! Really nice work Joe. I like the animated gif also. Bob Fay Joe Davenport (...) (25 years ago, 15-Aug-99, to lugnet.build, lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: i admit i was wrong
|
|
(...) A common priviledge here on lugnet is being able to post to any group, which would be revoked if the vote is against him. Exclusion from social acceptance could be achieved by no one answering his posts even with an "I don't know/don't (...) (25 years ago, 15-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
| | Re: Which set is the infamous Forest Wench in?
|
|
(...) (URL) (25 years ago, 15-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: NQC floating point library?
|
|
(...) Sorry, the standard RCX firmware doesn't support anything other than signed 16 bit integer math, so NQC doesn't do floating point. Depending upon the problem, you may still be able to convert the operation into appropriate integer math. If you (...) (25 years ago, 15-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
|
| | How much for a 6036?
|
|
Hey everyone, Last friday over at TRU I found a MISB 6036 Skeleton Surprise! Happy me! Although it keeps whispering "Do it! Do it!" at me, I've managed not to open it yet. First I'd like to know if it's worth anything in unopened condition. I just (...) (25 years ago, 15-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: Give me strength...
|
|
(...) What? You nibble a small corner off a brick? :-) (25 years ago, 15-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | New Applicator MOCs at Joe's Lego Page (love those tracks)
|
|
I purchased some of the track pieces from Pitsco and just love them. I built a concept spreader with some, and they work great. Now I have to build a Sandcrawler! The running gear on the other rig has wheels that rotate like the machine from the (...) (25 years ago, 15-Aug-99, to lugnet.build, lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Castle-themed building MOCs
|
|
I've just put up a couple pictures of some mostly-complete castle-theme buildings. They're available at: (URL) was my attempt to fill in a critical but missing part of the castle theme - normal buildings. I'd love to get some comments/suggestions on (...) (25 years ago, 15-Aug-99, to lugnet.build)
|
|
| | Re: Bulk Ordering - Secrets Revealed.[Star Wars Question]
|
|
(...) Where can I write them to tell them otherwise. A Snail-Mail letter would, I think, be most effective. Does anyone know which address would be appropriate? I didn't see any obvious addresses on their web-site. Ciao! (25 years ago, 15-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: i admit i was wrong
|
|
(...) BTW, if the group does decide to hold a vote on this, I'll be sitting on the sideline -- I won't be casting a vote on this. For the record, however -- and this is only my opinion having followed this very closely since its inception -- I do (...) (25 years ago, 15-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
| | Re: Bulk Ordering - Secrets Revealed.[Star Wars Question]
|
|
(...) More likely, TLG will attritube the success of the Star Wars line entirely to the fact that they are Star Wars. They'll ignore the fact that the quality of the model designs are head-and-shoulders above anything else they've done recently. (...) (25 years ago, 15-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: Parts for LDraw or parts for POV-Ray?
|
|
(...) I don't think TLG has changed much since then. I also think TLG was blowing some smoke, and Carsten gave up too easily. I'm pretty sure Carsten could have made some cosmetic changes to satisfy TLG. Steve (25 years ago, 15-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Parts for LDraw or parts for POV-Ray?
|
|
(...) "Leveraging the LDraw knowledge-base" :p (...) Isn't that something? I think it would make much more sense if everyone built their library using some obscure, *nix-based (that's a bit redundant) raytracing program. Steve (25 years ago, 15-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Parts for LDraw or parts for POV-Ray?
|
|
On Sun, 15 Aug 1999 00:28:15 GMT, Joshua Delahunty <dulcaoin@alumni.cse.ucsc.edu> wrote: [Update on the story of BriCAD and Carsten Gnoerlich] Thanks for the information, Joshua. I hadn't heard of btopia. Heck, the last thing I knew, I was (...) (25 years ago, 15-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: i admit i was wrong
|
|
(...) Suggestions for asking questions: Be as specific as possible. In this case, you are working on a specific detail, so you could post the part, with the problem-areas marked by comments: 0 *** The following 4 lines don't work right *** <bad line (...) (25 years ago, 15-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|