 | | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
--SNIP-- (...) Well he did sign off jchat at 1300 GMT... Tim (20 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose all the .robotic threads?
|
|
(...) :) :) :) .trains, .space, .castle, and .general are nice, but this is important! .Robotics is gone! :) :) :) Chris (20 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
(...) ya ya, I know. I read the MIT article as well. ;) (...) Wait a minute. 1100 and 1500 GMT. Where was ROSS at that time? (...) "Admin" ?? are you talking about Dan? opps. wrong Brick Lug. Chris (20 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
(...) --SNIP-- (...) You can needn't bother with the tin foil hat Chris. They don't do anything anyway. LUGNET also just murfled posts in .build.schleim, .build.mecha and .trains. In fact, it murfled every post between about 1100 and 1500GMT today. (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
(...) Pray tell. It appears to have affected .trains, .space, .castle, and .general as well.... JOHN (20 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
|
| |
| | OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
I cant find any of the .robotic threads anywhere.... OK, wait. Let me just put on my tin foil hat... (adjusting) umm, OK I think I see what happened. Ross !!! What the heck did you just do? Admit it, this is some sort of subtle attack right? First (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Iron Mecha: Provost
|
|
This is my Iron Mecha entry: Provost (URL) After moderation: (URL) I'm reasonably happy with the outcome. Any comments are welcome. Cheers, Mark. (20 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
|
| |
| | Bygge av stor legotågbana.
|
|
Har köpt på mig Lego i snart 8 år och det börjar bli tid att börja bygga nu. Sonen har blivit 8 år så han börjar bli duktig på att bygga. Har 50 m2 rum till förfogande,250 m 12v-räls och 35 olika tågset. Därtil finns oxå 2 m2 osorterat Lego Vad ska (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.loc.se)
|
| |
| | Re: inchworm 3D
|
|
Hi kevin, (...) thank you :) (...) Yes just like in my mini quad (...) Yes the are way to cool (...) Sigurd (20 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms
|
|
(...) I believe there are JIT for J2ME environments which can be as low as 128KB of RAM. I'm not disagreeing with you, I'm just stating that the JIT technology is applicable to embedded systems and the argument of "its too complex" doesn't always (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms
|
|
(...) I think this would be a nice project and prove very useful. (...) I'm not really advocating Java or any language. Personally, I think Java is in appropriate for low-level programming and one is probably best off with C/asm. However, in this (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Should I lubricate my Lego motor?
|
|
(...) Is this triggered by time or by usage? (i.e. will a motor that is run more wear out faster?) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: SpeedRail TGV Thalys
|
|
(...) I'm so very sorry. I meant Jason Allemann. I'd only just woken up so my brain was still a bit fuddled. Tim (20 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: SpeedRail TGV Thalys
|
|
(...) I have and it's very impressive. (...) I'm using the technique David Allemann invented for his O-train ((URL) see it here>). It is by far my favourite close-coupling technique and I have even built it in the brick before (which is pretty rare (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Should I lubricate my Lego motor?
|
|
(...) You may want to check if your motors are the new type 9V geared motor (#43362). If so, please be aware it is prone to failure, the first sign being sticking. Pl see my previous post on this ailment: (URL) amount of lubrication is going to (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Test - trying to get rid of annoying legal signature
|
|
Sorry for that test. I am just trying to get rid of my company signature by using a web based post service :) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms
|
|
(...) You should try very high level math... So yes every effort should be made to ease learning but definitel, as others said, one language won't fit everyone needs, because those needs can really be way too different. Laurent -- IMPORTANT NOTICE: (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms
|
|
(...) Wrong :) For two reasons: - a JIT is quite complex if you want to really gain something and requires too much memory (remember the NXT only has 64 KB of RAM); - JIT and real-time are not good friends... On top of that, a carefully implemented (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | NXT + BlueTooth + PC (was: Java Baad)
|
|
Ditto to pretty much everything on this thread. My present robot has a PC running Linux talking to an RCX over IR, using my own (not XML!!) message protocol. For a look at how this can play out, check out what these guys did with some NSA money: (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: ecco le FAQ sul NXT
|
|
(...) Però mi è appena venuto un dubbio... E i motori? I cavetti di conversione andranno bene anche per loro? (20 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.it.itlug)
|
