 | | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
|
(...) how about gravity??? see, you cant just say your bot ~NEEDS~ something just to make it a bot. you need to add a challenge that will make it easier to USE the RCX then not. For the BoP game, if you didnt want to see the tower robots, make a (...) (21 years ago, 19-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
|
(...) At one time we did have an unofficial rule were you DID have to use an RCX. that has pretty much changed with Rob's "monkey bot" we have seen that cool solutions can be had without using the rcx. the best way to "force" an RCX event is to have (...) (21 years ago, 19-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Motorized microscale train
|
|
(...) Cool! That should sort the problem of how to propel 2-wide trains (for those who don't have N-gauge track)! Mark (21 years ago, 19-Sep-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
|
(...) the jokes are HALF the fun of this game. Chris (21 years ago, 19-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
|
(...) ineresting.... but i had a closed design in mind. as steve has said, this open top hopper makes it too easy to plant a box and walk away. so your standard repitcle. should be a X by X hole in a wall, vs an open top box. i think a hole in the (...) (21 years ago, 19-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
|
(...) I'm with you Derek - the object of the contests is to come up with the best and most creative solution. And the ring "bots" were definitely creative. My take on this is that the ring bots were a little too close to Jeff E's fish sticker sumo (...) (21 years ago, 19-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: The Better Tosser
|
|
(...) Between burning out two motors on a prototype and having the tire in my pirate ship become bald by the end of BrickFest, I think I'm done building GBC shooting mechanisms. But they're so much fun . . . I wonder if my prototype (which is still (...) (21 years ago, 19-Sep-05, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 1955 'idea book' Byggebog, translation help needed
|
|
(...) Dave, Thanks for the great scans. This book is really interesting! Eric (21 years ago, 19-Sep-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
|
(...) Well that’s true, like I said I don't mind creations like that, just heard a few people make comments such as "is that a robot?" and such at rtl 19, so thought I might suggest it. Myself I have a few ideas that don't include an RCX either, and (...) (21 years ago, 19-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: What mailing list for Peeroml ?
|
|
Hi Tim, Thanks for your comments. (...) I don't expect OCaml to spread like a virus, or being a popular scripting language. All that i have asked is a single homepage where people (eventually nobody) could have downloaded the whole thing. I didn't (...) (21 years ago, 19-Sep-05, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
