 | | Re: SWATBot
|
|
(...) OMG, I'll say. That's cool Tony. Crossposted to .mecha. (I'll update the sidebar too.) That's pretty hip, I'm mostly impressed by the fact you got two levers that'll hold the bot up. More impressed that the levers hold all the weight. Cool. (...) (21 years ago, 4-May-05, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 10170 TTX Intermodal Double-Stack Car Preview
|
|
In lugnet.trains, James Seibert wrote: <snip> (...) Actually, Jake already delivered on this request, although in a sneaky way. It was Jake who (strongly?) suggested to the set designers that set #7045, Hovercraft Hideout (URL) would greatly benefit (...) (21 years ago, 4-May-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 10170 TTX Intermodal Double-Stack Car Preview
|
|
(...) No, I think his move was a good one. The classic "I know I made a mistake, but through word play I will make it seem like you are the one with the mistake" You just didn't get the joke. ~Kevoh what's this thread even about? some new train? (21 years ago, 4-May-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 10170 TTX Intermodal Double-Stack Car Preview
|
|
(...) Nice try there, J2... Well played, in fact, but no. You lose. (21 years ago, 4-May-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Buildings with 4 Walls
|
|
(...) I would guess that it isn't the AFOL's that would disparage the "doll house" comparison, but I bet the 8-10 year old boys might have a problem with it. (...) Those lucky enough to live near a pick-a-brick location know that 1x4x3's aren't that (...) (21 years ago, 4-May-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 10170 TTX Intermodal Double-Stack Car Preview
|
|
(...) Might not have occurred to you that I was kidding; perhaps a bit too subtle. Sorry for any confusion on your end:-) JOHN (21 years ago, 4-May-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 10170 TTX Intermodal Double-Stack Car Preview
|
|
(...) Glad I wasn't the only one who noticed those... I think the part in question is this (URL) one>. Which unfortunately was only shipped in one set (the rather rare 3800). It would be very nice if those were available at PaB. It would be great if (...) (21 years ago, 4-May-05, to lugnet.publish.photography, lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 10170 TTX Intermodal Double-Stack Car Preview
|
|
(...) This is what is called pointing out that YOU were wrong, within the framework of apology. Sorry if it was a bit too subtle for you! How about this?? "You're wrong! Twice in one thread tree, no less!" (some snippage) (...) Ya, that pretty much (...) (21 years ago, 4-May-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | GBC module screw and stepper
|
|
Hi, Both of my modules are complete. You can find pictures at (URL) thanks to philo a movie at (URL) (21 years ago, 4-May-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: 10170 TTX Intermodal Double-Stack Car Preview
|
|
(...) Marginally, yes. But much more important is the significant reduction in tare(1) weight, and the reduction in length. Since TOFC/COFC(2) is operated at high speeds, in long trains, less tare means more payload per horsepower used, and less (...) (21 years ago, 4-May-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
