 | | Re: Delurking MOC from me Peter
|
|
(...) Thanks for the feedback! You are right about the photos I moved while I was taking them next time I will us my tripod. More MOCs coming soon! Peter P.S. Just in case you were wondering I did wind up getting the shooting cannons so I will be (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-04, to lugnet.castle, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Mercedes Benz Actros 1840 Strawtransport, Scale 1:13
|
|
This is great! Very life like. Nice execution of design. A friend and I toured your new site. You do nice work. Very well done. e (21 years ago, 4-Nov-04, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam)
|
| |
| | Re: Most stunning motorbike ever?!?
|
|
(...) Hi David! (...) I was looking at the rear set up on the bike and I'm not sure how "strong" it was. I know any set issued has to at least have the strength test passed. So maybe it was just a fan. Who knows. It was just fantastic that's all I (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | fibra ottica e Mindstorms
|
|
Nel set Mindstorms 2.0 c'è un bello spezzone di fibra ottica. Molto semplicemente, a che cosa serve? ...spero non solamente come prolunga da abbinare al sensore ottico (fino lì c'ero arrivato). Ricordo un po' di tempo fa di aver visto un annuncio su (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-04, to lugnet.org.it.itlug)
|
| |
| | Re: Most stunning motorbike ever?!?
|
|
(...) It would admittedly be pretty awesome! Although I wonder if they've "learned their lesson" with chrome-intensive sets on the UCS Naboo Fighter. Granted I think this would do better than the Naboo Fighter, but it seemed like that set just kinda (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I want to become a reviewer
|
|
(...) Is this true? I've been out of the "official update" loop for a while, but when I suggested this method a year or so ago it was rejected due to "sub-part clutter" and the fears of an unreasonable burden upon parts-authors. Has this changed (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: cylinders missing conditional lines?
|
|
(...) Actually, if you use conditional lines that follow the red tangent lines, as in Travis' diagram, then you want them to overlap. You get partial coverage from each of them that adds up to the total coverage you'd get from the original style of (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Most stunning motorbike ever?!?
|
|
Hey do you guys think this might have been a preview of a real set? It at least looks like it could be. I wonder why it was removed. I really wanted to show it to someone. Speculation? Thoughts? That would be one heck of a set. I'd buy it in a snap. (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: three mountainbikes
|
|
(...) I really like these, Lars. Perhaps the black bike needs the front forks at a greater angle to increase the wheelbase? Otherwise, it's close, but too square as you mentioned. Still a great model, though. Thanks for sharing, Ed (21 years ago, 4-Nov-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: I want to become a reviewer
|
|
(...) So I understand that studlogos may face any direction as long as they are not mirrored? How about a mix of rotated studlogos on one single part instead of all studslogos facing the same direction? E.g. some studlogos readable when the part is (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
