 | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
|
(...) My apologies. (...) I won't sleep tonight (...) Nope. (...) Perhaps that is the problem. I found no firm legal argument, only opinion. I a seminal post perhaps? (...) I'd agree, what Todd did is more important than what you/he calls it. (...) (...) (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2001 Set info
|
|
(...) I hate replying to my own posts and quoting dictionaries, today I shall do both: From: (URL) verb [T] to remove parts of (something to be read, seen, or heard) because it is offensive or considered morally wrong, or because it is secret She (...) (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Gift for Suzanne
|
|
The end result of our combined efforts for Suzanne may be seen in Eric's photo: (URL) (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.org.ca)
|
| |
| | More NMRA pictures posted...
|
|
The BayLTC club pictures are posted online. They are sorted by day at the moment, but were named so we can put them in one directory later on, once we get a web page set up. :-) (URL) Day 1 (Friday) was for dealers and NMRA members only. Day 2 and (...) (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.trains) !
|
| |
| | Re: 2001 set info
|
|
(...) I have one reason why Lego may get the ATST under $10.00. Can you say Throwbot. Those are only $6.00 and would be not too much under ATST size, especially since the Lego one will be smallist anyway. Tim (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Booth monitors and crowd control
|
|
(...) I was planning on a one-foot square base with a socket for the pole. Paul S (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf)
|
| |
| | Re: Pricing on Lego Sets
|
|
Ian Sinclair <sinclair@cadvision.com> wrote in message news:398cef65.194772...ion.com... [...SNIP...] We consumers all recognize the great play value in LEGO sets; especially when you or your child has a good size collection. However, getting to (...) (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Booth monitors (look and feel)
|
|
(...) Lego doesn't make them big enough. Paul S (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf)
|
| |
| | Re: 2001 Set info
|
|
(...) I think that's too simple an answer. The list didn't contain any really shocking information. It had some Star Wars sets, which are fairly recognisable by their names- and then it had some other set names which could, frankly, be just about (...) (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: THE WINNERS!
|
|
Hehe... thanks Jeff. And if you run that contest, I'll be glad to enter a starfighter model. :^) ~Mark (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: 2001 Set info
|
|
(...) So you're agreeing, then? Nothing here was censored, which is confirmed by the very definitions you quote. Do be clearer in future, hmm? (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Where Brooklyn at? (Was: racial politics, black pack, etc.)
|
|
(...) Except the first movie, where finding a non-european face is almost impossible. I think this happened in part because it was shot (mostly) in England, but Lucas was roundly criticized for it. Bruce (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: 2001 Set info
|
|
(...) That's precisely what I'm doing. As long as he's convinced that what he's doing isn't editorial control he's never going to seek legal advice about it, is he? (...) ++Lar (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Builder's Block (no pun intended....)
|
|
Can someone please give me an insanely complecated project to undertake? I seem to be out of ideas at the moment. Thanks. Also, does anyone know when the Pneumatics Pack and the Power Puller will be available in the US? (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: 2001 Sets
|
|
(...) :) (...) Yeah, but wouldn't the Escape Pod be a pretty small set, say around $5.99? That would probably mean it'd include a maximum of 2 characters, & wouldn't they most likely be R2-D2 & C3-P0? (...) Yeah, if we're assuming an Imperial year (...) (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: 2001 Set info
|
|
(...) I think that's too simple a dismissal. See my previous post about isolated facts and how they can add up to Really Big Secrets. "this fact by itself doesn't tell you much" is not a valid defense in and of itself. Besides, unless we're in the (...) (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Pricing on Lego Sets
|
|
(...) I think what you mean here is that until The LEGO Group redefines "play value" to what you want it to mean, or what you think it means, they have not recognized the importance of play value. But play value is all TLG talks about. Read their (...) (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2001 Set info
|
|
(...) I am not sure if anyone major could change there production runs now. I suppose knowlege at the lower end of the food chain is much more powerful: If I were a toy shop and I knew TLC had an impressive range on the way - I may not buy (...) (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Nuove strade
|
|
(...) :-(((...((( Allora mi tengo le strade con le striscie bianche e verdi :-)) Ciao Ernesto P:S grazie per l'informazione (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.loc.it)
|
| |
| | Re: 2001 Sets
|
|
(...) they (...) Unless it comes with the imperial search squad that finds it in the desert? :-) Scott A (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
