 | | Re: A brief state of NELUG message.
|
|
(...) Well, ain't I just the social butterfly? (...) Hmm. The main difficulty in holding the BrikWars event at Bison County would be, err, well, the extreme weirdness of walking into there with scenery, armies, dice, papers, rulers, and actually (...) (26 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| |
 | | Re: A brief state of NELUG message.
|
|
(...) I've been meaning to give you the ol' digital Mazel Tov for a while now, Eric... All the best to you and yours. eric (26 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| |
 | | F/S, 6289, 6195, 6769, 6543
|
|
I have the following new, unopened sets for sale. The boxes show little or no shelf wear. The prices shown are in US dollars and do not include shipping. I'll add a flat rate of $5.00 for shipping to the US or Canada. 6289 Red Beard Runner $95 6195 (...) (26 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| |
 | | Re: A brief state of NELUG message.
|
|
<snip> (...) You can count me in (Depending on Date and time of course). Eric Kingsley (26 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| |
 | | Re: sign up for $20 free postage
|
|
(...) Robert, I've been using Avery 5163 Shipping Labels (all white) and an HP 4 LaserJet to print my Stamps.com postage for about two months (+/- 75 packages) without any problems... A satisfied Stamps.com customer, Gene Rodriguez III (26 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.market.shipping)
|
| |
 | | Article about RCX Mindstorms in MSDN's Developer Network Journal
|
|
In the issue of march/april 2000 of Microsoft MSDN's Developer Network Journal, there is an article about RCX Mindstorms. The article talks also about Jonathan Knudsen's book "The Unofficial Guide to Lego Mindstorms Robots". The RCX and the book are (...) (26 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
 | | Re: sign up for $20 free postage
|
|
(...) Actually this is true only if it weighs 1 pound or more. If it is less than 1 pound you can leave it in the box for pickup or drop it in a blue street corner box. For me the time savings is waiting in line at the post office to buy stamps. (...) (26 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.market.shipping)
|
| |
 | | Re: User POV substitutions in L3P
|
|
George GeoMan wrote... (...) The good thing about L3P: it is INDEPENDENT of part updates. The not so good thing about L3P: some rounded parts look egdy/angular. /Lars (26 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
 | | Re: User POV substitutions in L3P
|
|
Chuck Sommerville wrote... (...) Good idea, I have thought of it myself too :-) But I have postponed the implementation because I was hoping for an integration of LGEO and L3P: the effort writing POV replacements for LDraw parts naturally belongs in (...) (26 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
 | | Re: Guardate questa
|
|
(...) questo e (...) testamento (...) Ci conto. Poi magari la Lego nei prossimi anni se ne esce proprio con mattoncini 3x7, e da quel momento la tua vita è in pericolo :-))) Ciao Mario (26 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.loc.it)
|
| |
 | | Re: Velux set is *still available* from Velux!
|
|
I have one of these (unopened) that I'd part with for the right offer of 12V train stuff in trade (see (URL) I'd only consider cars/stations or the 7862 in return, not other track or accessories--well, with the possible exceptions of lots of sliding (...) (26 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| |
 | | Re: A brief state of NELUG message.
|
|
(...) I don't mind, but it'd be nice to find somewhere a little less red-meat oriented. (...) I'm extremely interested. (26 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| |
 | | Re: Article about RCX Mindstorms in MSDN's Developer Network Journal
|
|
"Marc Klein" <marckl@easynet.fr> wrote in message news:4adfcs4k3ngvp7c...4ax.com... (...) Journal, there is an article about RCX (...) Unofficial Guide to Lego Mindstorms Robots". (...) on DNJ site (...) page. Hope that they will never port Windows (...) (26 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
 | | RE: sound generators
|
|
The Handyboard has one on it. Therfore, if you look in the manual's part's list, it should list where it's from. (...) This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No (...) (26 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
| |
 | | Re: User POV substitutions in L3P
|
|
(...) I'ts not too difficult to incorporate LGEO and L3P in the same POV file. I've done it once to get a high level of details in a wallpaper rendering: (URL) was surprised that noone mentioned this.) What you basically need to do to cram LGEO (...) (26 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
 | | Re: Cleaning discolored white bricks
|
|
(...) Just make sure it isn't in the same condition mine was when I hunted it down in the garage a few weeks ago - to quote my reaction "Tins of Brasso shouldn't go 'clunk' should they?" and my wife's response "Uhhh, no. No, it should be more of a (...) (26 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
 | | Re: User POV substitutions in L3P
|
|
Fredrik Glöckner wrote... (...) No, the mathematics is easy, just a simple matrix in POV. But Lutz mentioned something about a special index file and flags for transparent parts and slopes. And I can see LeoCAD's code to read the file. But I would (...) (26 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
 | | Re: Shopping In Edinburgh
|
|
(...) At TRU prices this is a universal statement I think. Glasgow Govan still has Podracer sets at £59. Wake up and smell the roses guys. (...) Do TRU ever have clearances over here - I have never seen one. Ian Bishop, Ayrshire, UK (26 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
 | | Re: Here's An Idea I have
|
|
(...) because (...) Has this been confirmed? Last I heard, it was just a rumor. -- -Bones- = (URL) = NecroBones Enterprises Richard Schamus wrote in message ... (...) before (...) I (...) get (...) blacktron, (...) stuff. (...) because (...) (26 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
 | | Re: Palm Tree Junior
|
|
(...) (URL) Sorry, I was thinking about this guy as opposed to his new juniorized counterpart, the 1x2 brick. -John (...) (26 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|