To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 31442
31441  |  31443
Subject: 
Re: The newer magnets...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:44:32 GMT
Viewed: 
23733 times
  
In lugnet.trains, Benn Coifman wrote:
   That’s the biggest problem with the new magnets, the buffers are integrated. It would have been so much more versatile if the cross bar had studs where the buffers go and then the actual round buffer be a separate part, e.g.,



American trains (my preferred subject to model) don’t have buffers. This is the reason I’ll be sticking to the old couplers for the foreseeable future. At least until Big Ben Bricks, ME Models, or some one else comes out with a suitable replacement. Either that or I start experimenting with Kadee couplers but I haven’t grown comfortable to that idea yet.

Cale



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The newer magnets...
 
(...) That's the biggest problem with the new magnets, the buffers are integrated. It would have been so much more versatile if the cross bar had studs where the buffers go and then the actual round buffer be a separate part, e.g., (URL) (13 years ago, 29-Sep-11, to lugnet.trains, FTX)

7 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR