Subject:
|
Re: List software?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 4 Apr 2001 05:58:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2379 times
|
| |
|
|
"Russell Nelson" <lego-robotics@crynwr.com> wrote in message
news:15049.48238.578695.306492@desk.crynwr.com...
> Andy Gombos writes:
> > So what software does this? If it is so common to have in an
> > e-mail program, then which do it?
>
> I know of no email software with a "Reply to Recipient" command --
> *THAT* is the problem. That's why mailing list operators are under
> such pressure to misconfigure their lists. Think about it -- "Why
> would you want to reply to yourself"? However odd it sounds, the
> command is *precisely* what is needed to reply to a mailing list.
Try Outlook Express (is avaible for Win 9x, Win NT, Solaris, Linux, Unix)
This program has a Reply Group button and Reply (to sender) works great.
/Martin Eriksson
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: List software?
|
| Doesn't "Reply to Group" only work with New Groups (NNTP), not e-mail lists? And don't ALL e-mail clients have a 'Reply To All' function? Can't you just do that and erase the recipient you don't want (in this case, the sender)? -- V (...) (23 years ago, 4-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: List software?
|
| Andy Gombos writes: > So what software does this? If it is so common to have in an > e-mail program, then which do it? I know of no email software with a "Reply to Recipient" command -- *THAT* is the problem. That's why mailing list operators are (...) (23 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
