 | | Re: New Civil Engineer letter —George Haberberger
|
| | | (...) I think he's right. I have a BS degree in Aerospace Engineering, and took many courses in engineering mechanics. The simplifications used in engineering mechanies are better modeled by Meccano (or Erector sets) than in Lego. Techniq is better (...) (23 years ago, 5-Jul-01, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: New Civil Engineer letter —Simon Bennett
|
| | | | | (...) Thanks George, I agree with much of this and am glad someone has taken the opposite view. BUT... From the context of the original letter I think the author is referring to education well below undergraduate level where analysis will not be (...) (23 years ago, 5-Jul-01, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: New Civil Engineer letter —George Haberberger
|
| | | | | | (...) Reading your letter, I think you should send it, my remarks are better suited for an undergraduate class, or perhaps a high level high school class. I don't have any Civil Engineering background (other than that which would have been common to (...) (23 years ago, 5-Jul-01, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: New Civil Engineer letter —Simon Bennett
|
| | | | | | (...) I have now sent the letter. I didn't change it that much and it's still very long but I wanted to get it out there before I got cold feet about sending it at all! The text was: "Dear Sir I would like to take the opportunity to respond to (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jul-01, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: New Civil Engineer letter —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | In lugnet.loc.uk, Simon Bennett writes: <snip> (...) <snip> You rock. Very nicely done. I think I speak for a number of people when I say "thanks for doing this, well done!" ++Lar (23 years ago, 6-Jul-01, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: New Civil Engineer letter —Simon Bennett
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) Cheers Larry, I've got a nice warm Lugnetty 'included' feeling now! All we have to do now is just sit back and watch New Civil Engineer not publish it! Psi (23 years ago, 6-Jul-01, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: New Civil Engineer letter —Steve Baker
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Yes - nicely said. One difference that *is* significant from an educational standpoint (IMHO) is the use of tools. Meccano really does require you to use a screwdriver and spanner (aka wrench)...where Lego doesn't really require tools at all (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jul-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | RE: New Civil Engineer letter —Ralph Hempel
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Ummm, can you adopt older (39 yrs) kids like myself? :-) Cheers, Ralph (23 years ago, 6-Jul-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: New Civil Engineer letter —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | | | (...) [text snipped] (...) Well, I didn't comment yet in this thread, because I'm not an engineer or a teacher (though I did start in engineering at uni), and I hadn't really thought much about it. I did have one small Meccano set when I was a kid, (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jul-01, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: New Civil Engineer letter —Simon Bennett
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) Crikey ROSCO, all I did was write a letter, you built the bridge! Psi (23 years ago, 6-Jul-01, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: New Civil Engineer letter —Anders Isaksson
|
| | | | | | | | "Ross Crawford" <rcrawford@csi.com> skrev i meddelandet news:GG1utI.nE@lugnet.com... (...) what (...) Meccano is also juniorizing, and putting out more "models" and less basic sets. -- Anders Isaksson, Sweden BlockCAD: (2 URLs) (23 years ago, 6-Jul-01, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: New Civil Engineer letter —Thomas (T. J.) Avery
|
| | | | | | (...) That's great, Simon! I hope all of our comments and input were constructive enough. Your final revision of the letter was not too long, hit some very important points, and certainly made a good argument that Lego is a better "building system". (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jul-01, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: New Civil Engineer letter —Thomas (T. J.) Avery
|
| | | | (...) True, you do end up with a 4-wide eccentric connection. However, gusset plates can be used instead of trying to line up 4 members on a common pin. This can be accomplished by using extra beams or other members at the joint. You may not end up (...) (23 years ago, 5-Jul-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
