 | | Re: What a downer :-( —Ronald Vallenduuk
|
| | | "Bob Gomez" <kukumba@aol.com> wrote in message news:H83wI4.56M@lugnet.com... <snip> I guess some will say that the market has changed and kids today don't have the attention span that they used to. </snip> I'm getting a bit tired of hearing this (...) (21 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.technic)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: What a downer :-( —Matt Hein
|
| | | | | (...) Hmm...that's one of the sole reasons I'm a nonconformist. Some can say the blessings of our society and technology really better humanity, but is this really true? Is it a 'blessing' that if someone is bored they instead turn to the TV or (...) (21 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: What a downer :-( —Richie Dulin
|
| | | | | | | (...) What are the other sole reasons? ;-) Cheers Richie (21 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: What a downer :-( —Gregory Cook
|
| | | | | | (...) Not every board game lasts as long as Monopoly or a marathon game of Go. And there's plenty of kids who play RPGs that take up to 100 hours to finish, so I'm gonna have to disagree on just plain (video) "games" being the problem. Even (...) (21 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: What a downer :-( —Matt Hein
|
| | | | | | (...) No, probably not. I admit plenty of attention is needed to play (I don't believe I stated otherwise.) However, when people begin to grow dependent on video games for entertainment, it is common that they tend to play for long periods of time (...) (21 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: What a downer :-( —Gregory Cook
|
| | | | | | (...) I was under the impression that all the problems being listed in the post(s) I replied to were related to the short attention spans being cultivated in new generations these days. Addiction to one form of entertainment may be bad, but it's a (...) (21 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: What a downer :-( —Steve Burge
|
| | | | | Yeah, but a lot of this comes down to parents who should really monitor what their children are doing and make sure they don't do too much of one thing - be it watch TV, play video games or even read books or play with lego. Video games have an (...) (21 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: What a downer :-( —Ronald Vallenduuk
|
| | | | | | "Steve Burge" <steveburge@b_i_g_f_o_o_t.com> wrote in message news:H856EB.6DA@lugnet.com... <snip> Video games have an advantage over board games in that you can play them when no-one else is willing to play a game with you</snip> Isn't that down to (...) (21 years ago, 4-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: What a downer :-( —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | (...) The 24 hour cartoon channels are great! They keep my bird entertained while I'm at work (he likes Nick the best). As to children, just don't let them watch all the time (though in truth I'll sit and watch The Fairly Oddparents or Samurai Jack (...) (21 years ago, 4-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: What a downer :-( —Soren Roberts
|
| | | | (...) We need more ranting, not less. Rants almost always give greater insight into your personal experience, and that can only be beneficial. It may not be the easiest thing to swallow, but truth is like that. I agree with you on every other point, (...) (21 years ago, 4-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
