Subject:
|
Re: LEGO Company announces poor performance in year 2000
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 1 Mar 2001 18:37:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
536 times
|
| |
|
|
Ray & All,
> BTW (moving off on a tangent), did anyone else notice
> what was conspicuous by
> its absence form the recent catalog ? How about Knights
> Kingdon, Arctic & Rock
> Raiders. Where'd they go ?
If I remember right, they are on two year cycles, and I
think all the ones you mentioned are on it.
Scott S.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LEGO Company announces poor performance in year 2000
|
| (...) Rock Raiders, yes, I think so... 1999 sets. Arctic and Knights Kingdom?? I'm not sure about that, aren't they 2000 sets? So they're not quite at end of life yet. Note that, IIRC, the Spring catalog traditionally has been the "lightest" and (...) (23 years ago, 1-Mar-01, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LEGO Company announces poor performance in year 2000
|
| (...) My guess would be Star Warsz. Every store that had overstock, always had large amounts of SW. I wonder if TLC still has warehouses full of it. SW was a licensed product line. Not only did TLC have the overhead of designing the sets, but (I (...) (23 years ago, 1-Mar-01, to lugnet.general)
|
41 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
