 | | Re: BFC Tool?
|
|
(...) This version does not work with the following line for the editor: "C:\Programme\LDraw Design Pad\LDDesignPad.exe" "%f" cu mikeheide (16 years ago, 7-Sep-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC Tool?
|
|
(...) Mike replied: (...) Agreed. Sorry I didn't test it better. We fixed one issue, but not both. (URL) to have fixed the issue. No other new changes. (FoundryB.zip is gone, there wasn't much of a point to keeping it around) -- joshua (16 years ago, 8-Sep-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC Tool?
|
|
(...) Thanks, works great now! Two new bug reports nonetheless ;o) - Line number shown in status bar is off by one (eg it shows 234 when actual line in the file is 235) - Both display and tree expansion use Hi-res primitives (when they are (...) (16 years ago, 8-Sep-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC Tool?
|
|
(...) Works fine here also (regarding spaces in filenames) with "C:\Programme\LDraw Design Pad\LDDesignPad.exe" "%f" as entry for the editor. cu mikeheide (16 years ago, 8-Sep-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC Tool?
|
|
(...) Hey! I told you we were old-school programmers. Doesn't the whole WORLD count starting from zero now? :grin: I'm imagining that it's easy enough to fix. Oddly, I find that it takes me to the right line in the file in notepad2 anyway. It's (...) (16 years ago, 8-Sep-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC Tool?
|
|
In lugnet.cad, I had written: (...) This had been purposeful, base-0; I convinced that the status bar should start at 1. %d should now represent base-1 line number in the command line issued, and %D represents the base-0 line number. (...) Yes, this (...) (16 years ago, 11-Sep-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Foundry, (was Re: BFC Tool?)
|
|
(...) Thanks - text editors I know start numbering at 1. (...) ;o) In a perfect world Hires would be a good choice, but since everything is not hires substitution yields misfits and gaps I find especially ugly (same thing in LDview). I have another (...) (16 years ago, 11-Sep-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Foundry Technology Preview Tool (was Re: BFC Tool?)
|
|
(...) That's why the easier one to use, lower-case, is 1; and the backup option is there "just in case". (...) Oh, we agree, and that's why it's now an option. The original intent was to get the best looking viewer for developing the OBI syntax (...) (16 years ago, 11-Sep-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Foundry Technology Preview Tool (was Re: BFC Tool?)
|
|
(...) (drooling over the possibilities...) (...) Sorry again... I totally agree that it is something that can wait for an official release! (...) Yes - parts/ too. (...) Sure. Keep us posted with new previews! (...) Thanks! Philo (...) (16 years ago, 11-Sep-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
