Subject:
|
Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Tue, 2 Oct 2007 17:33:59 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
6822 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Steve Bliss wrote:
> In lugnet.cad, Steve Bliss wrote:
> > After messing around, I (manually) got the image for 58119.dat
> > straightened out
> > <http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/58119.dat>
> >
> > But I haven't convinced the script that it should run this way. Yet.
>
> OK, that wasn't so hard. The script should be fixed now. I've pushed
> through > re-renders for 58119 and x919. All other parts are queued
> for re-rendering, all images should be updated in a short time.
>
> If anyone wants to look at the ldliterc.dat file, you can grab a copy at
> http://www.ldraw.org/library/unofficial/ldliterc.dat
It looks like you have a bug in whatever program you're using to
convert ldconfig.ldr to ldliterc.dat.
In the first set of colors on each line the blue value always
seems to be the same as the green value.
Don
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
| (...) "Program"? I wish. It was a manual conversion, not all of the entries are amenable to programmatic conversion. (...) Doh! It should be fixed now, take a look. No wonder the orange switch on the PF box looked so odd... Steve (17 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Why LDraw.org doesn't use ldconfig.ldr ???
|
| (...) OK, that wasn't so hard. The script should be fixed now. I've pushed through re-renders for 58119 and x919. All other parts are queued for re-rendering, all images should be updated in a short time. If anyone wants to look at the ldliterc.dat (...) (17 years ago, 2-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
43 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
