 | | Re: NEW LEGO Direct LEGEND #10041
|
|
(...) Coolness!! And I like those Duplo ...whoops, excuse me "Explore" as well. Might ask my SO to buy those. She collects Duplo, I only do 'minifig' ;-) Mark "sgonna be another good year for my addiction" de Kock (22 years ago, 20-Dec-02, to lugnet.year.2003)
|
| |
| | Re: NEW LEGO Direct LEGEND #10041
|
|
In lugnet.year.2003, Kevin Loch writes: market doing it's job :) (...) Actually they just deep linked to images on the LEGO website. Doh! KL (22 years ago, 20-Dec-02, to lugnet.year.2003)
|
| |
| | Re: NEW LEGO Direct LEGEND #10041
|
|
(...) Also, the vehicle wheels look to be the newer model (replacing the ones with metal axle). The hubs are red though, and I cannot recall other sets where that colour was used for wheel hubs. Pedro (22 years ago, 20-Dec-02, to lugnet.year.2003)
|
| |
| | Re: NEW LEGO Direct LEGEND #10041
|
|
(...) YEEE...EEESSS...SSS!!! At last, it is here! REAL city buildings! Not police, not fire stations... a car dealer and a construction site! Oh my... Come to think of it... now only *two* of the proposed re-releases are missing. Do you suppose we (...) (22 years ago, 20-Dec-02, to lugnet.year.2003, lugnet.loc.pt)
|
| |
| | Re: NEW LEGO Direct LEGEND #10041
|
|
Here they are, James: (URL) do people find these images? -JHK (...) (22 years ago, 20-Dec-02, to lugnet.year.2003)
|
| |
| | Re: NEW LEGO Direct LEGEND #10041
|
|
Can someone post a link to the pictures? My proxy filter here at work will not allow me to visit the parsimony.net site. Thanks, jt (...) (22 years ago, 20-Dec-02, to lugnet.year.2003)
|
| |
| | Re: NEW LEGO Direct LEGEND #10041
|
|
(...) It looks loke the cypress tree and the cool rails were substituted. You can probably find the trees on Ebay or BrickLink since they were recently remade (until the mold went bad as we were told at BrickFest). The rails, by far the coolest (...) (22 years ago, 20-Dec-02, to lugnet.year.2003)
|
| |
| | Re: NEW LEGO Direct LEGEND #10041
|
|
Right, at this rate, the votes and polls seem to have lessened significance... we're getting all the sets anyway; we just have to wait a few weeks longer for some! Seth. (...) (22 years ago, 20-Dec-02, to lugnet.year.2003)
|
| |
| | Re: NEW LEGO Direct LEGEND #10041
|
|
Hi, Thanks for the info! Any idea when it will be available? I wonder if the Battrax and Yellow Castle are next... James (...) (22 years ago, 20-Dec-02, to lugnet.year.2003)
|
| |
| | Re: NEW LEGO Direct LEGEND #10041
|
|
Cool! Yep, this is the set I would have picked if I was a Town fanatic. I might even buy it, and I only collect Space! --Dave (...) (22 years ago, 20-Dec-02, to lugnet.year.2003)
|
| |
| | NEW LEGO Direct LEGEND #10041
|
|
Set #10041 to appear in 2003. It will be the Legend version of the US-only set #6390 (Main Street) from 1980. Here are the first images: (URL) the old version, of course: (URL) *CHRIS* (22 years ago, 20-Dec-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.year.2003) !!
|
| |
| | Re: The Adventurers are going all the way to China...
|
|
(...) but not because of the silutte in the lower right hand corner. I think it will be another figure like the Yeti in 7412 and the tiger in 7411 included with the China sets. As noted before, on the map there appears to be three areas outlined: (...) (22 years ago, 18-Dec-02, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.year.2003, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: The Adventurers are going all the way to China...
|
|
(...) To illustrate just what it is I'm trying to say about what I see, I made this real quick: (URL) making this picture, I noticed what might be a whisker, or perhaps a very long tooth. I would hope it's a whisker (which goes well with the whole (...) (22 years ago, 18-Dec-02, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.year.2003, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: The Adventurers are going all the way to China...
|
|
(...) I'm going to risk throwing my opinion out there. Now I fancy myself as a dragon lover, I wouldn't say expert, but I would certainly go so far as to say that I've seen alot of dragons in my day. And in my opinion, and it is of course just my (...) (22 years ago, 17-Dec-02, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.year.2003)
|
| |
| | Re: The Adventurers are going all the way to China...
|
|
(...) Thanks Grant. That was very quick. I see what you mean about the silhouette. Its certainly a standard dragon body there, but an interesting head on it. -- James Stacey ---...--- www.minifig.co.uk #925 - I'm a citizen of Legoland travelling (...) (22 years ago, 17-Dec-02, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.year.2003)
|
| |
| | Re: The Adventurers are going all the way to China...
|
|
"James Stacey" <james@minifig.co.uk> wrote in message news:H79C9E.5xw@lugnet.com... (...) the (...) next (...) like (...) clip (...) Here you go: (URL) Giandonato Check out my eBay auctions: (URL) (22 years ago, 17-Dec-02, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.year.2003)
|
| |
| | Re: The Adventurers are going all the way to China...
|
|
"Grant Giandonato" <ggiandonato@comcast.net> wrote in message news:H73MA3.HMq@lugnet.com... (...) current (...) more (...) and (...) me, (...) figs. (...) can you provide a scan of this. I'm not expecting to see these in the shops over here any time (...) (22 years ago, 17-Dec-02, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.year.2003)
|
| |
| | Re: The Adventurers are going all the way to China...
|
|
(...) Hmm...equally mystified myself. At the current discussion, besides the head, I hope Lego makes some new dragon body parts, wings and arm designs as well, so as to make customizable draconic forces. ( I'm still tempted to cross the dark side (...) (22 years ago, 14-Dec-02, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.year.2003)
|
| |
| | Re: Missing orient sets?
|
|
(...) Hi This sounds like exciting news. Does anyone have a scan of the back cover with the China sets? Perhaps these sets could be the missing set numbers 7413 and 7416? Kecia (22 years ago, 14-Dec-02, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.year.2003, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: The Adventurers are going all the way to China...
|
|
"Jeremiah VanderMark" <Doggybot_37@yahoo.NOSPAM.com> wrote in message news:H73JuJ.Aq2@lugnet.com... (...) back (...) a (...) year. (...) the (...) I agree. I'm especially interested in the dragon silhouette. I wonder what's up with that? -- Grant (...) (22 years ago, 14-Dec-02, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.year.2003)
|
