 | | Re: 2002 catalog scans at FBTB
|
|
(...) critical (...) I too like the new canopies. Always good to have new types of these. And in trans brown and red too! I'm mildly dissapointed that they don't have a hinge on the back. I miss the old days with canopies that connected to a 1x4 (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: 2002 catalog scans at FBTB
|
|
(...) I don't think this is the case. If you look at the new Harry Potter sets, the goblins look shorter than mini-figs. Notice the tallest to shortest line up of Hargrid(creator fig), Harry(mini-fig), and the goblin(mini mini-fig?). It appears that (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: 2002 catalog scans at FBTB
|
|
(...) No offense Jason, but I think, with exception to the new ogel underwater base, that the new Alpha team offerings suck. The shark sub is nice if you remove the wierd contraptions on the front. I think subs have been done too much.... lego (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: 2002 catalog scans at FBTB
|
|
(...) I have to agree with you on this....I was also disappointed looking at the "fall preview". I think they brought out too much good stuff over the summer. Now that the days are getting colder, so are the designs.... I guess!!! I think the rebel (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: 2002 catalog scans at FBTB
|
|
(...) The Twin Pod pics are badly-composed in terms of lighting and angle. It's hard to glean much, but it looks like it is mostly regular red with dark red highlights. Am I the only one who thinks that Vader looks suspiciously like a K'Nex figure?! (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
