|
|
 | | Jurassic Park III Spotted in New Jersey (USA)
|
| Hi all, The message is what it says it is. I stopped at the plaza on NJ Route 18 southbound just after the Turnpike interchange to go to the Tuesday Morning there (and I found a bunch of little brown raft guys for $1.49 apiece, yay!), and I figured (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jun-01, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.year.2001)
| | | | | RG Mech Completed!!!
|
| Hey all, It's with great delight I present the "RG Mech". (URL) by people I've met on Lugnet as well as it's founders. Thank you so very much for helping to create a place for crazy Lego builders like myself. Just as much thanks and praise to (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jun-01, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.announce, lugnet.build, lugnet.lego, lugnet.org.us.lugola, lugnet.year.2001)
| | | | | Robo Gamers?
|
| (URL) Who are they. Where did they come from? Do they exist? Could we see a BattleBots like theme? Or is the whole line a fake? No trace. No pictures. No info. No nuthin'!!! NICK (who dosn't think these are real.) (23 years ago, 3-Jun-01, to lugnet.year.2001)
| | | | | Re: New 84** technic?
|
| (...) Looks like a print mistake. It should be 8466 since 8266 was already used by Spyder Slayer a.k.a cheap motor + half beam pack. (23 years ago, 29-May-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: New 84** technic?
|
| (...) They're making the engines smaller to meet current emissions standards (grin) Matthias Jetleb VA3-MWJ (23 years ago, 29-May-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: New 84** technic?
|
| (...) Monster trucks, off road vehicles, lumber harvesters etc. etc. but not back-hoes. (...) Zooming in on the picture you can spot the text on the inside of the tires so the printing is still there. The printing was on the same side on the 8457 (...) (24 years ago, 27-May-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: New 84** technic?
|
| (...) Yes, I thought about pointing this out but forgot it before I sent the post, thanks for taking care of that for me :) /Tobbe (URL) (24 years ago, 27-May-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: New 84** technic?
|
| (...) LOL I had the exact same thought on this model when I first saw it. I'm a big fan of off-road vehicles in general and, at least from the pictures I've seen so far, this model really appeals to my tastes. I'm really looking forward to this (...) (24 years ago, 27-May-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: New 84** technic?
|
| (...) The problem with the air shock has been fixed in the later revisions of the part, I have 2 of them and they havent broken yet. (24 years ago, 27-May-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: New 84** technic?
|
| (...) Nah, not likely they're only making the models bigger to fit their size mistake ,) (...) I'm not as thrilled as most ppl. seem. I already own four of the wheels from the Power Puller and I can't figure what to make of them, they are to wide (...) (24 years ago, 27-May-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: New 84** technic?
|
| What I love, and what makes the set 8266 look appetizing is the apparent diminutive size of the v8 engine. Or maybe they ARE making the engines smaller :))) The more I look at the picture the more I love it. Don't you just want to climb in there and (...) (24 years ago, 27-May-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: New 84** technic?
|
| (...) I have an old 1986 catalog which lists the 8660 set as the "5-wheeled snow ranger"...LOL Although both of these models look very impressive. I especially have very hgh hopes for the 8466 one... -Gaurav Thakur, raving madman Can be reached at (...) (24 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: New 84** technic?
|
| Same here, I on 84xx I know from Previous Catalogs that any Advance Kits will come in the new 84xx Range. This could be one of the many misprints that Lego Has done!! BTW has anybody come up with a list of the misprints from catalogs? -- Michael - - (...) (24 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: New 84** technic?
|
| "Johannes Keukelaar" <johannes@nada.kth.se> wrote in message news:GDxy1D.B25@lugnet.com... (...) its (...) Interesting... The retailers catalogue scans that were leaked a while ago had them as 8465 and 8466. I reckon one or the other is wrong. My (...) (24 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: New 84** technic?
|
| WOW! Those are undoubtly the best shots I've seen yet! But, the set numbers got me wondering too :-/ Back in late April when I reserved my order through US S@H I used the number 8466 and on a recent order update, it's still listed as 8466. Could it (...) (24 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.technic)
| | | | | New 84** technic?
|
| Hi all, Just saw another message raving about the new 4wd technic cars, and with good reason. Here's the image from FbtB: (URL) They look extremely cool. However, the set numbers shown are 8265 and 8266. 82** has, since its introduction, been the (...) (24 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: ???No new Posts???
|
| (...) Which group? .year.2002? Your post was only the 37th! But anyway, just wait about four months, and watch all sorts of fun appear. (24 years ago, 24-May-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: It's a good day for Mecha
|
| (...) Em yes its is...a good weekend for me to build mecha...due to school/homework comin before the homework during the week. But then again its also a good weekend for raveing too...;) -John (24 years ago, 17-May-01, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.year.2001)
| | | | | It's a good day for Mecha
|
| Yes a good day for Mecha. Eric "Legomaster" Sophie 2001 (24 years ago, 17-May-01, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.year.2001)
| | | | | Re: Creator set found
|
| There were several colors of plates. It did have brown bricks, but I can't remember if it have brown plates. I will stop by tomorrow and look at it again. I didn't write down the set number either, :(( Rose "r2" <lego@r2eng.com> wrote in message (...) (24 years ago, 16-May-01, to lugnet.year.2001)
|
|
