|
|
 | | Re: The Toy Book's report on LEGO 2001 (U.S.)
|
| So, what does 'Zooters' mean? Is it a licensed theme, known in the US? Eric (24 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.duplo, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Much to my surprise, Racers are kind of cool!!!!!!!! (4567 Surfer)
|
| (...) I could nawwwwt believe my eyes when I saw how small those little buggers are. Although I am sooooo not in the target market, it was still disappointing to see. (...) Oh, that's what those ratings are for? OK, that kinda makes sense now. When (...) (24 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.year.2001)
| | | | | Re: Much to my surprise, Racers are kind of cool!!!!!!!! (4567 Surfer)
|
| We have Surfer and Shredd. I was disappointed that the wheels are fixed, since I wanted to make and all-blue racer. My kids found the "slammer" action to be frustrating. It was too hard to actually launch two cars and hit each other. The driver (...) (24 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.year.2001)
| | | | | Re: Much to my surprise, Racers are kind of cool!!!!!!!! (4567 Surfer)
|
| Bradley Dale <dinosauria_ca@yahoo.ca> wrote in message news:G9CKIJ.7MF@lugnet.com... I too bought one of these at the weekend. I wasn't that impressed, but my daughter, in the target age range, liked it. (...) The 2x2 curved slope used on the front (...) (24 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.year.2001)
| | | | | Much to my surprise, Racers are kind of cool!!!!!!!! (4567 Surfer)
|
| RACERS have LEGO studs on 'em! They have two cool decorated Spaceish elements. The driver is a 2x2 brick and can be used as a little gargoyle. I used the car brick on a Castle tower MOC today, so it is not useless! You just gotta be creative with (...) (24 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.year.2001)
| | | | | NEW Bionicle rumors...
|
| Hi all! For the latest Bionicle rumors check my Bionicle News section of brickmaster.de . Here's the direct link: (URL) that these are rumors but as they are based on facts received from insiders, most of them (if not all) will certainly turn out to (...) (24 years ago, 24-Feb-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.year.2001)
| | | | | Re: The Toy Book's report on LEGO 2001 (U.S.)
|
| (...) wow. It's true. (interesting to compare these two reports) (URL) trying a different Google search, I found this. I feel kinda dumb now. Info is a month old. But, well, it _is_ 4:30 a.m. here. My mind could be numb because I need sleep. -Suzzz (24 years ago, 24-Feb-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.duplo, lugnet.general)
| | | | | The Toy Book's report on LEGO 2001 (U.S.)
|
| I really don't know what's news here anymore, but after doing some LUGNET searches, I didn't see any sign of some unusual words in this report I have. This is from the toy retailer industry magazine, "The Toy Book," which reports on toy companies, (...) (24 years ago, 24-Feb-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.duplo, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: AW MAN!
|
| (...) Then ask this guy: (URL) :^L~ (24 years ago, 22-Feb-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.town)
| | | | | Re: AW MAN!
|
| (...) Nope. Don't hate myself. Not over Jack Stone. Not even a little bit. (24 years ago, 22-Feb-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.town)
|
|
