 | | Re: 2002 catalog scans at FBTB
|
|
(...) First i'd like to thank Tim, Second, WHAT IS UP WITH THE MINI_MINIFIG LEGS?!? Do the Ewoks and Gobblins have half-legs? The heads and tourso/body sections seam normal... But the LEGS, i don't get the legs? Hopefully the high-rez pictures will (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: 2002 catalog scans at FBTB
|
|
(...) Stubbies is my guess (can I coin that phrase now, for everyone to use for the rest of time?) [1] This would make sense for the future Yoda figure too. And HP house-elves. And children. And...well, you see the possibilities can go on and on... (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | 'Stubbies' (C) Richard Noeckel!
|
|
(...) You sooooo can NOT! I claim infringement of my term… >:-\ I used it first, I put brackets around it… It’s rightfully mine!?! That goes for TLG too! (They can’t use the term with out first consulting me.) Hello, I did initiate the whole (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: 'Stubbies' © Matthew Gerber (Richard's just deluding himself!)
|
|
(...) Oh no, no, no...you said "'stubby' version" in refering to the minifig legs...I actually used the all inclusive term "Stubbies©" [1] to indicate the same, but in an entirely more elegant way. I also, of course, footnoted "Stubbies©" [1] with (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: 2002 catalog scans at FBTB
|
|
(...) They're doing the same thing for the Ewoks (and Yoda someday?) that they do for Anakin and Harry and all child-sized characters since the beginning. They're going to just make them the same damn size as everyone else. Looking at the flying (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: 2002 catalog scans at FBTB
|
|
(...) I don't think this is the case. If you look at the new Harry Potter sets, the goblins look shorter than mini-figs. Notice the tallest to shortest line up of Hargrid(creator fig), Harry(mini-fig), and the goblin(mini mini-fig?). It appears that (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
