|
|
 | | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
| (...) Hmm, but if you were to go on the asumption that kids these days jsut aren't into building, and that today's industry is based on hype and advertising, what about the fact that there are no television commercials for Lego anymore? Surely you (...) (25 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
| | | | | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
| (...) What? I know he mentioned it with SW, but I don't remember him saying it abotu Castle, I thought people were merely speculating that. (25 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
| | | | | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
| (...) FTR, Brad mentioned (at Brickfest) that Castle sets could not be released as long as Lego has the Harry Potter License, just as Space cannot be released as long as they have the Star Wars License (and yes, that means no Classic or Legends). (...) (25 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
| | | | | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
| In lugnet.year.2002, John Rudy writes: <snip> (...) Roger that... They gave the info, they knew what would happen to it, no issue. Matthew, by being mysterious, is doing his source a disservice. (if it was OK for him to know and discuss, he ought to (...) (25 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
| (...) Geez, replying to my own post...this is bad, but I needed to revisit this with some thoughts. Yeah, I agree, Harry Potter is a poor substitute for a true castle theme. Also, Star Wars is a poor substitute for a true Space line (although I (...) (25 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
|
