 | | Re: LEGO Theatrical "trailer"
|
|
I saw that too, as a advertisement before "Meet the Parents". Pretty cool, I thought, to see it advertised so mainstream. And a great place to advertise it too. Very precise marketing. Speaking of no Studios newsgroups yet . . . sounds like a good (...) (25 years ago, 11-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Theatrical "trailer"
|
|
I saw that too, as a advertisement before "Meet the Parents". Pretty cool, I thought, to see it advertised so mainstream. And a great place to advertise it too. Very precise marketing. Speaking of no Studios newsgroups yet . . . sounds like a good (...) (25 years ago, 11-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Theatrical "trailer"
|
|
(...) My biggest problem with it, as a D&D player (although I haven't been in a campaign for a couple years now), was that the characters didn't act like D&D characters. I mean, I got a good chuckle at a couple of points imagining the interactions (...) (25 years ago, 11-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Theatrical "trailer"
|
|
(...) A movie like that really has big shoes to fill, since it's competing against the imagination of millions (?) over 25+ years! Anything they tried would be bound to disappoint some viewers, I suppose, but I'm glad to hear it wasn't too bad... (...) (25 years ago, 11-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001)
|
| |
| | Re: Do we have a name for the new figs?
|
|
(...) Not bad- FARTs. That could work. Or how about Weak Tiny Figures? (I'm still attached to "suckifigs", though.) (...) Agreed. (...) Good point... but it begs the question: If you really want your aliens to look different then why do they have 2 (...) (25 years ago, 11-Dec-00, to lugnet.build.minifigs, lugnet.year.2001)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Theatrical "trailer"
|
|
(...) I'd have to say in the movie. Yes, I've seen better, but it wasn't bad. eric (25 years ago, 11-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Theatrical "trailer"
|
|
(...) Were the special effects better in the movie or in the Lego trailer? Dave! (25 years ago, 11-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001)
|
| |
| | LEGO Theatrical "trailer"
|
|
Hey all.... (I am placing this in lugnet.year.2001 only because there is no lugnet.studios group- since it's moved into a full-blown theme, should there be one?) I went to the movies on Saturday night to see "Dungeons and Dragons". Before the movie (...) (25 years ago, 11-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: MARS INFO!
|
|
(...) The picture is the alternate model for LoM 7310 'Mono Jet' - it comes in a small box and not a polybag. So do the Studios 'Camera Man' and 'Stunt Man' sets. But you're right - the stunt man is a bit cheesy. The Mono Jet is worth the small (...) (25 years ago, 11-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: new Technic product shown!
|
|
(...) I wouldn't recommend exposing the pneumatics in the LEGO Technic Search Sub (8250/8299) to water. I had some pneumatics when I was a child, and it was all ruined from exposure to water. Perhaps the new style pneumatics is higher quality, (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.technic, lugnet.year.2001)
|
