 | | Bright Future for LEGO Trains? (was Re:No LEGOFest...) —John Neal
|
| | | (...) <snippage galore> Really? I couldn't disagree more. I think the theme Trains could easily eclipse all other themes combined. If it can catch on as an accepted hobby among model railroaders, look out. LEGO trains are getting a lot of free (...) (24 years ago, 27-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.trains)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Bright Future for LEGO Trains? (was Re:No LEGOFest...) —Lawrence Wilkes
|
| | | | | (...) eclipse (...) model (...) train (...) trains (...) demonstrated (...) needs (...) model (...) operating (...) But lego's commitment to trains has declined rapidly in the last couple of years. The latest trains have moved in the opposite (...) (24 years ago, 27-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Bright Future for LEGO Trains? (was Re:No LEGOFest...) —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) I think LEGO Trains, as a niche market, would be best served by TLC focusing on producing good-looking sets, while keeping costs down. If the rumors about a Trains-meets-Mindstorms product line are true, that will (hopefully) address the need (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: No LEGOFest...) —Bram Lambrecht
|
| | | | | (...) Have you ever had an article (or tried to get an article) about the LTCs in a model RR magazine? I'm sure that would greatly help acceptance... --Bram Bram Lambrecht / o o \ BramL@juno.com ---...---oooo-----(_...o---...--- WWW: (URL) (24 years ago, 27-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Bright Future for LEGO Trains? (was Re:No LEGOFest...) —Ben Fleskes
|
| | | | John and Robin have some really good points. Allow me to side in with my opinion. In some cases it is frustrating that LEGO doesn't sell the extended train product line through retailers. But for that to be effective, it would require knowledgable (...) (24 years ago, 27-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Bright Future for LEGO Trains? (was Re:No LEGOFest...) —John Neal
|
| | | | | (...) I don't even bother to go to their website. Mr. Justus, are you listening? (...) Excellent ideas, Ben. Makes *perfect* sense. Mr. Justus, are you listening? ;-) (...) Agreed. (...) Even if they cut the line entirely, I could see LEGO trains (...) (24 years ago, 27-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Bright Future for LEGO Trains? (was Re:No LEGOFest...) —Jonathan Reynolds
|
| | | | | | | (...) what (...) continue (...) without (...) And I (...) Clone Brands - are you listening? If LEGO do abandon model trains altogether (save for some token intergalactic attempts at wheeled ICBMs) then the natural course of events will lead to (...) (24 years ago, 27-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Bright Future for LEGO Trains? (was Re:No LEGOFest...) —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | (...) BTW, the above is Ben speaking, not me:-) (...) ROTFL (...) I don't know if it would be a competitor, but an opportunist. Right now someone could come in and produce Bettendorf style trucks to fit LEGO track gauge and I buy'em in a heartbeat. (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Bright Future for LEGO Trains? (was Re:No LEGOFest...) —Richard W. Schamus
|
| | | | | | | | (...) on (...) of (...) intergalactic (...) as (...) someone (...) I (...) knuckle (...) is (...) I've been deciding where to enter this discusion, and I think that the place is here. WAMALUG has at least one of us who is using DCC for train (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Bright Future for LEGO Trains? (was Re:No LEGOFest...) —Tony Kilaras
|
| | | | | | John Neal wrote in message <38B98A61.71320167@u...st.net>... (...) a (...) trucks and (...) it (...) were (...) are (...) years.... How would you attach a nonLego engine to Lego? (24 years ago, 27-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Bright Future for LEGO Trains? (was Re:No LEGOFest...) —James Powell
|
| | | | | | | (...) Krazy Glue. James P (24 years ago, 28-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Bright Future for LEGO Trains? (was Re:No LEGOFest...) —Kya Morden
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Funny, that's how I fixed my 4.5v train stop signal (for lack of a better term). It was that red pole with the red train signal which was used as the train logo in the catalogs. It had a white what was it, 4x8 base that connected under the (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Bright Future for LEGO Trains? (was Re:No LEGOFest...) —Jonathan Reynolds
|
| | | | | | (...) I've seen this done the other way round (using a lego train motor for a conventional O gauge model engine)in an old "Railway Modeller" magazine from the late 70s. It involved splitting the mechanism vertically, presumably to maintain a 32mm (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Bright Future for LEGO Trains? —John Gerlach
|
| | | | In lugnet.trains.org, Ben Fleskes writes: <snip> (...) <snip2> (...) Yep, it will thrive because the fans (us!) are dragging the company into the modern age... Instead of Lego leading the way, they are trying to keep up with us. We come up with more (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
