To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trains.orgOpen lugnet.trains.org in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / Train Organizations / 1269
    Re: IOLTC Update —Kevin Loch
   (...) Huh? You have to be kidding. In every train show that WAMALUG has participated in, the promoter *begged* us to put up a display. There have never been any issues that I am aware of. Is such a group necessary? Is it even desiarable, considering (...) (23 years ago, 3-Mar-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
   
        Re: IOLTC Update —Eric Kingsley
   (...) Well the one thing I would like to know is how much other clubs (especially those that participate in Greenberg) get for honorariums. We (NELUG) have also been begged to do these shows and I seriously wonder if we are getting an honorarium (...) (23 years ago, 4-Mar-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
   
        Re: IOLTC Update —John Neal
    (...) I'm sure LD is aware of it (they *do* read LUGNet), but why would anyone assume that they would have anything to do with it? They have nothing to do with it. The IOLTC will approach LD as an org to discuss ways that TLC can support LTCs doing (...) (23 years ago, 4-Mar-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
   
        Re: IOLTC Update —Kevin Wilson
     John Neal wrote in message <3AA1CB7A.833172CD@u...st.net>... (...) assume (...) it. This is why (quoting from teh first message in this thread, by Mike Walsh): (...) This statement needs to be either stated to be wrong (please!) or explained (...) (23 years ago, 4-Mar-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
    
         Re: IOLTC Update —John Neal
      (...) My explanation? Blame Canada! <g,d&r> -John (...) (23 years ago, 4-Mar-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
   
        Re: IOLTC Update —Eric Kingsley
   In lugnet.trains.org, John Neal writes: <snip> (...) Well I am sure they are aware of it too but I asked if they were "formally aware" of this group I.E. had a hand in its formation. I get the feeling now that maybe they didn't but I think its (...) (23 years ago, 4-Mar-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
   
        Re: IOLTC Update —John Kelly
   ...snip... (...) ...snip... We ALWAYS need more bricks. <grin> (23 years ago, 4-Mar-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
   
        Re: IOLTC Update —Larry Pieniazek
   (...) And more (minifig) people! Conan's collection has too many MISB Airport Shuttles and not enough 2x4 bricks... :-) ++Lar (23 years ago, 4-Mar-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
   
        Re: IOLTC Update —Steve Bliss
   (...) I hear that some GMLTC minifigs have business plans on opening a 2x4 and 2x2 brick mine. There's bricks in them thar' modules! ;) Steve (23 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
 

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR