 | | Re: Three New Train Cars
|
| Chris, Wow, looks great. I really like the caboose. I hate cutting tubing, but the curved railings look so good that I might have to cut some tubing for my caboose. Did you use stiff (pod racer) tubing or flexible tubing? Also, I like the steps. Is (...) (24 years ago, 29-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: Three New Train Cars
|
| Chris, (...) Thanks! I used the stiff tubing (from the technic sub I think) for the railings. I was able to get two railings from one whole piece so I wasn't wasting any tubing. There is a probhlem with the tubing tear the part of the endwall off (...) (24 years ago, 29-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: Three New Train Cars
|
| (...) (URL) at 8 wide, we are in desperate need of some thin railings, ladder wrungs, stairs, etc.... -John (...) (24 years ago, 29-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: Three New Train Cars
|
| (...) rungs. wrung is the state of your neck the next time you mention 8 wide gratutitously. Hope that helps. ++lar (24 years ago, 29-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: Three New Train Cars
|
| (...) nice one ;) (24 years ago, 29-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: Three New Train Cars
|
| (...) First off, the thread is about 8 wide cars, so your 6 thin comments are irrelevant. *I* gratuitously mentioned 14 wide, so there-- you are rong. -John (...) (24 years ago, 29-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: Three New Train Cars
|
| (...) Well john this isnt your day is it and since i still have a grudge rong is spelled Wrong :Þ (...) (24 years ago, 29-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: Three New Train Cars
|
| (...) John, do you want to tell him or should I? Dave! (24 years ago, 29-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: Three New Train Cars
|
| (...) heh-- my fault for not using Senor Winky or Mr Sic;-) (language barriers are in place here so I will give Kai credit for catching my misteak) -John (...) (24 years ago, 29-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: Three New Train Cars
|
| (...) I'm sorry, did I say it wasn't? :-) I doooon't THIINK so... You got away with your advocacy *this time* because it WAS relevant. My warning is to preclude you in future should you be tempted during a *non* relevant thread. Hope that helps. (...) (24 years ago, 30-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: Three New Train Cars
|
| (...) Thanks, I am reworking the front of the truck and the railings on the truck. The old design had some clearance issues. I'll try to get a picture of the new railings up this weekend, even though the rework isn't done. Chris (24 years ago, 30-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: Three New Train Cars
|
| (...) BUT, when admonishing me for "the next time" I gratuitously mention 8 wide, you *imply* that it was thusly *this* time as well. Sloppy, imprecise language is the bane of clear communication... oh well >;^D Program note: Lar and I are just (...) (24 years ago, 30-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: Three New Train Cars
|
| (...) No, I don't believe I did make that implication. If you drew that inference where it wasn't implied, I'd say that was sloppy, imprecise, non critical thinking on your part. (...) Well, you're certainly the expert from long practice on sloppy (...) (24 years ago, 30-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Three New Train Cars
|
| (...) I'm not sure about a language barrier--he writes as well as some allegedly native speakers of English I know! Still, I apologize to Kai for my snippy jab; nothing was meant by it. Dave! (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.trains)
| |
