To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 8176
8175  |  8177
Subject: 
Re: A brick in page 10 of #7777
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Sun, 12 Nov 2000 18:25:42 GMT
Reply-To: 
johnneal@uswest.net#nospam#
Viewed: 
1985 times
  
I think JW is making fun of your syntax, which IMO is rather harsh for a guy
who only recently discovered the shift key and punctuation in general....

Should read "Sets that contained this part"

-John

Manfred Moolhuysen wrote:

> In lugnet.trains, Jonathan Wilson writes:
> > > Sets that this part contained:
> > ROFL :)
> 
> Hey, I can't help the part is an antiquity, I just answered the question.
> And I've used past tense on purpose :-)



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: A brick in page 10 of #7777
 
(...) Hey, I can't help the part is an antiquity, I just answered the question. And I've used past tense on purpose :-) (26 years ago, 12-Nov-00, to lugnet.trains)

11 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR