Subject:
|
Re: Funicular conclusion
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Thu, 31 Aug 2000 20:21:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
482 times
|
| |
|
|
> I had the problem that
> cogwheel would very easily skip when a steep incline was attempted. I could
> easily come up with a better mechanism but doing it in the confines of a
> realistic looking locomotive is really hard.
>
> Matt
Simple...Sideways/Locharbar(sp) rack...need I say more?
James
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Funicular conclusion
|
| (...) Playing with this last night, I could get the engine to climb roughly 45% slope, which was steep enough that the problem I ws having was that the train wheels didn't have enough weight to hold them on the track... James (24 years ago, 1-Sep-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Funicular conclusion
|
| (...) I've tried this one with a Technic motor driving a cogwheel and carrying its own battery pack. It worked fairly well but I was disappointed to discover that it was outperformed (in terms of maximum incline) by an old 4.5V train motor using (...) (24 years ago, 31-Aug-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
