 | | Re: Toy vs Model...The real issue (was Re: Another 6wide/8wide ramble) —John Neal
|
| | | (...) Unless, of course, your layout is 22' long like the GMLTC's is (and growing;) (...) Not true. I rabbit sleep time;-) -John (...) (24 years ago, 25-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Toy vs Model...The real issue (was Re: Another 6wide/8wide ramble) —Mike Poindexter
|
| | | | John Neal <johnneal@uswest.net> wrote in message news:38B70743.BC3916...est.net... (...) layout (...) have (...) are (...) your (...) wide) (...) inter- (...) growing;) (...) I think that a more accurate measurement of size would be running feet of (...) (24 years ago, 26-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Toy vs Model...The real issue (was Re: Another 6wide/8wide ramble) —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) Yes. Here is a schematic: (URL) That is 108 large gray baseplates, or 168.75 square feet, which is (...) lol Mike, I applaud your devotion-- all I can say is....GET HELP (building;) (...) Absolutely we will have to:-) J-1 and I have been (...) (24 years ago, 26-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Toy vs Model...The real issue (was Re: Another 6wide/8wide ramble) —Christopher Masi
|
| | | | Oh, did I just get psyched out. I checked you layout outline and the pointer turned into a finger, and I thought, "WOW, a map to the layout. Very nice." I clicked and got the layout outline again...d'Oh! Actually, it is nice to see the organization (...) (24 years ago, 26-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
