Subject:
|
Re: New Train Window Ideas (old and copied)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Thu, 27 Jan 2000 23:46:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1460 times
|
| |
| |
I thought that the 1x1 w/side stud was a recessed side stud. Wouldn't that
leave a gap? I believe that we are going to be having these windows only
get one stud on each side connecting this way. Even still, as long as they
are staggered (one side on the top and one on the bottom) and the window is
sandwiched, it will be virtually impossible for it to turn.
Mike Poindexter
Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote in message
news:3890D613.39349C70@voyager.net...
> John Gerlach wrote:
>
> > > Forgot about that part. John G knows, though.
> >
> > Huh? What do I know??
> >
> > Which end are we talking about - the 'top' of the windows or the 'bottom'?
> > For the bottom use Larry's favorite piece
>
> That it is! Love that piece!
>
> > - the Technic 1.2 peg (or whatever
> > it's called). For the 'top', use the same technique, but in reverse - use a
> > 1x1 tile and a 1x1 plate on 'top' of the windows. The plate will fit into the
> > 1x1 technic brick, the tile will just fill the space above (or below) it...
>
> Yes, and with the "bottom" having two attachment points, (1.2 and 1x1
> w/side stud turned sideways) the top having only one should still be
> plenty to keep the windows securely held.
>
> --
> Larry Pieniazek - larryp@novera.com - http://my.voyager.net/lar
> http://www.mercator.com. Mercator, the e-business transformation company
> fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
>
> Note: this is a family forum!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: New Train Window Ideas (old and copied)
|
| (...) Yes. HOWEVER, the trick is to turn this piece sideways (so that the normal "back" is on the bottom), then put a plate on top. If you do that, the height is one brick, there is a stud AT THE BOTTOM EDGE of the face, and the stud is flush with (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New Train Window Ideas (old and copied)
|
| (...) That it is! Love that piece! (...) Yes, and with the "bottom" having two attachment points, (1.2 and 1x1 w/side stud turned sideways) the top having only one should still be plenty to keep the windows securely held. (25 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|