 | | Re: LL Trains (was Re:8 wide and bigger(was Re: 8 Wide)
|
|
(...) Try my web site: (URL) pictures legoland0089.jpg through legoland0107.jpg. These might be of help. Sorry for the quality, but it was raining on the opening day. :) Russell (24 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: LL Trains (was Re:8 wide and bigger(was Re: 8 Wide)
|
|
Thanks, Russell, although they give nice views of the yard, etc, they weren't quite close enough for me to be able to count studs;-( -John (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: LL Trains (was Re:8 wide and bigger(was Re: 8 Wide)
|
|
(...) I remember telling myself I needed to take close-up shots. Ummmm, I just found this link: (URL) (24 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: LL Trains (was Re:8 wide and bigger(was Re: 8 Wide)
|
|
(...) Assuming they are semmetical, the trains then are 20 studs wide. Better get that car _much_ wider there John! (24 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: LL Trains (was Re:8 wide and bigger(was Re: 8 Wide)
|
|
(URL) 403 - (URL) leads me to believe they are 16 stud, it looks like there are 3 4stud wide sections divided by 1x tiles, and the outside edges are 1x. Then again, the outside edges could be 2x, making them 18studs wide. (...) -- | Tom Stangl, (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: LL Trains (was Re:8 wide and bigger(was Re: 8 Wide)
|
|
(...) Yikes.. that looks like... 20-wide! No room for Selective Compression there! K.M. (24 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: LL Trains (was Re:8 wide and bigger(was Re: 8 Wide)
|
|
(...) Ahh, it appears that the different LLs are using different scales-- from 16-20 studs wide. I think I will stick to around 14 wide because I am going to use G scale wheels (and track, for that matter) and that width (13-14 studs) is about (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: LL Trains (was Re:8 wide and bigger(was Re: 8 Wide)
|
|
(...) pieces. I bet The Purists are drooling over this shot;-) I personally am not a big fan of this type of modeling (where one needs to "create" a windshield like this). It works well on such projects as creating a 30 foot Mt Rushmore, but for (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: LL Trains (was Re:8 wide and bigger(was Re: 8 Wide)
|
|
I checked when I was at LL CA and I am positive that they are 16 studs. LL CA uses a different kind of track than LL Windsor or Billund, I believe and so the scales of one LL train might not match up with another LL train. I personally will not go (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: LL Trains (was Re:8 wide and bigger(was Re: 8 Wide)
|
|
(...) Absolutely. 16 wide is ridiculously wide for LEGO track gauge; it would have to be on G scale gauge. Now Frank, there is no law (yet;) that says one only must build in one scale-- I build a little in minifig (for the GMLTC layout), mostly in (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: LL Trains (was Re:8 wide and bigger(was Re: 8 Wide)
|
|
(1:22.5 to around 1:32), according to my feeble-minded (...) 1:1 to 1:32. Not quite the smallest you can ride behind...Our current club newsletter (Vancouver Island Model Engineers) shows a O gauge engine hauling 2 people. There was a story 20 (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: LL Trains (was Re:8 wide and bigger(was Re: 8 Wide)
|
|
(...) Not really true. If you accept that the track gauge is 5 studs, then 3x5=15, which is the maxiumum proportion one should use (3x the track gauge is how wide the maximum normal load should be) For example, the SRRL #9 (2-4-4T was 7'3" wide, on (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: LL Trains (was Re:8 wide and bigger(was Re: 8 Wide)
|
|
John (and others, except James Powell who no doubt knows this already) You toss around "G Scale" a lot but unlike most other gauges, G isn't really just one scale. LGB is narrow gauge and thus is to a bigger scale (22:5 to 1??) than some of the (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: LL Trains (was Re:8 wide and bigger(was Re: 8 Wide)
|
|
(...) wide (...) are (...) I checked out the smaller (UK) prototype train models at LL Windsor - they are 18 studs wide and were a job to count whilst the trains were on the move. This translates to 144mm wide - about right for an 8'6" to 9' wide (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: LL Trains (was Re:8 wide and bigger(was Re: 8 Wide)
|
|
On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Jonathan Reynolds (<Fov6A8.HIq@lugnet.com>) wrote at 23:51:44 (...) ...And a bit wider is eight studs :-) I'm *definitely* going to try this soon. (24 years ago, 25-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: LL Trains (was Re:8 wide and bigger(was Re: 8 Wide)
|
|
(...) You are absolutely right, Lar. According to largescale.com, there are 7 different scales that run on #1 Gauge track. LGB is 1:22.5, Aristo-craft is 1:29 (except their Classic series, which is 1:24, USA trains and Bachman are (I think) 29:1. (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: LL Trains (was Re:8 wide and bigger(was Re: 8 Wide)
|
|
The (...) That then is _not_ G scale anyway...it is Gauge 1 Course Scale (track profile defines it as course/fine, although I am not sure how much the fine scale track profiles are used in Gauge 1) James Powell (with a 3 Gauge Loco somewhere to (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
