To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 30839
30838  |  30840
Subject: 
Re: 8879 no more?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Wed, 3 Jun 2009 22:59:59 GMT
Viewed: 
27700 times
  
In lugnet.trains, Jordan Schwarz wrote:
> 
> Steve Witt of LEGO was able to get me a quick reply regarding the 8879
> controller.
> 
> "There was a production problem with that one and it will be released later this
> summer. there was just a bump in the road on getting it out on time :-)
> 
> But yes it will be coming out."
> 
> -Jordan

Hi Jordan,

Thanks, that's good to know.  At least it will be coming back reasonably soon.
Presumably the collection will come back along with it.

> > What it did have was, the
> > 8885 remote controller, which in fact gives absolute throttle command, but it's
> > still line-of-sight (LOS), and continuous application (you have to push it 'on'
> > all the time). I think I'd like the incremental better, especially if I could
> > pretty much set it and forget it. I guess I'll never know now.
> > 
> > Have Fun!
> > C-Ya!
> > 
> > Rich

Rich,

But, is the 8885 proportional?  I thought it was just on/off.  I have a couple
so I guess I should go test :)

The issue with incremental commands is that if the receiver misses one,
everthing is now offset. IR is too unreliable for any protocol that requires
100% reception.  With absolute throttle, the control unit can send redundant
commands and there is no harm in extra ones and only delayed response from
missing ones.  I find it completely unfathomable that an engineer could walk
into a design review with an incremental IR-based protocol and exit the room
again with his hide still on his body.... but I'm old school that way :)

The specs are all out there and have been for a long time.  Maybe it's time to
crank out a homebrew throttle.  I'm pretty sure the receiver supports absolute
throttle commands.  If not, my rant will look pretty silly... I guess I should
go re-read the spec before launching any more flames :)

-dave



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: 8879 no more?
 
(...) I'd say it's no biggie since you can just keep turning the orange knob until you're happy with the speed. A bigger problem would be that the 8879 I had a chance to play with a while back (I'm still waiting for mine, ordered within 12 hours of (...) (17 years ago, 23-Jun-09, to lugnet.trains)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: 8879 no more?
 
(...) Steve Witt of LEGO was able to get me a quick reply regarding the 8879 controller. "There was a production problem with that one and it will be released later this summer. there was just a bump in the road on getting it out on time :-) But yes (...) (17 years ago, 3-Jun-09, to lugnet.trains)

8 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR