To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 29818
29817  |  29819
Subject: 
Re: LEGO 9V Train Communication II
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Thu, 20 Dec 2007 02:08:14 GMT
Viewed: 
31249 times
  
In lugnet.trains, Dave Curtis wrote:
One thought that comes to mind is that if we can reverse engineer the IR
protocol, there is no reason we can't build repeaters or our own controllers.
You could sprinkle IR transmitters throughout the layout and wire them all in
parallel. With that, the loco should never be out of reliable communication
range.

I already did something very close. I reversed engineer the IR protocol of the
Power Functions and created a small device that can both send and receive IR
commands. The components in this device probably cost around $10-15 (but
excluding the gadget that connects the thing to a PC to program it, which costs
$20-50 more). It connects to the NXT, but it's possible to build similar
stand-alone devices like repeaters, custom remotes, etc. One person used my
specification of the protocol to build a custom Power Functions remote.

Last year I made some measurements of the IR protocol of the IR trains, but I
wasn't methodical enough to allow me to reverse engineer that protocol from my
measurements. But I think that the two protocols are closely related. If
somebody lends me a Trains IR remote for a couple of days (in the Boston area),
I can probably reverse engineer that protocol as well.

The details are at <http://www.tau.ac.il/~stoledo/lego/AVR-ir/>.

Sivan



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: LEGO 9V Train Communication II
 
(...) <snip> (...) Very good! That is exactly what I was thinking. I work a lot with AVR's, too, so I'm happy to see you made the "right" choice in microcontrollers :) -dave (17 years ago, 27-Dec-07, to lugnet.trains)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: LEGO 9V Train Communication II
 
(...) Ummm.... except that you lose control when the train goes into a tunnel, or you have areas of unreliable control on your layout. Losing control in a tunnel would be a big deal for "serious" model railroaders that like off-stage "staging" (...) (17 years ago, 19-Dec-07, to lugnet.trains)

25 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR