To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 29800
29799  |  29801
Subject: 
Re: LEGO 9V Train Communication II
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Sat, 15 Dec 2007 16:10:52 GMT
Viewed: 
31086 times
  
In lugnet.trains, Remko Stift wrote:

wrote on the Dutch Lego forum the following:

- infrared control;

One interesting possibility is an IR remote that does not have to have a
constant signal to work. In other words, have the remote send commands that
change the state of the train, but not need to continuously send a "go forward"
command or similar. That would solve the "long dark tunnel" problem as well.

- rechargeable battery;

Good. I wonder if it will be related to the NXT Li-ion battery. There's good
(rechargeable, light weight) as well as bad (limited shelf life) issues there,
so I hope a non-rechargeable option is available as well.

- stepless speedcontrol from new remote;
- new PF is already in preproduction fase;
- cables not attached to motors;
- seperate receivers;
- multiple channel receivers i.e. lights can
  be controlled independant from speed.

Now speaking as a Mindstorms type... *very* good. The questions start popping up
fast. Two off the top of my head:

- Stepless (continuous?) speed control: That could imply PWM from the
receiver(s), so "smarter" receivers at least. Same for multi-channel receivers.
- Motors without attached cord: Not more flexible for building & wiring, but
perhaps implying a two-ended PF cord, or perhaps using a hybrid cord with a
different connector (NXT?)

I already use the IR remote with my track
powered motors, which is great fun...

How do you do that?

--
Brian Davis



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: LEGO 9V Train Communication II
 
(...) Ummm.... except that you lose control when the train goes into a tunnel, or you have areas of unreliable control on your layout. Losing control in a tunnel would be a big deal for "serious" model railroaders that like off-stage "staging" (...) (17 years ago, 19-Dec-07, to lugnet.trains)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: LEGO 9V Train Communication II
 
(...) The Lego workshop participant from the Netherlands wrote on the Dutch Lego forum the following: - infrared control; - rechargeable battery; - track the same as current, maybe curves with bigger radius; - stepless speedcontrol from new remote; (...) (17 years ago, 13-Dec-07, to lugnet.trains)

25 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR