Subject:
|
Re: LEGO 9V Train Communication II
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Thu, 13 Dec 2007 19:59:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
30487 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Jonathan Wilson wrote:
> If they are still using IR (i.e. line of sight) for communications, forget
> it. If they go to some kind of non line of sight control (e.g. whatever the
> Fischer-Price GeoTrax system is using), I will consider it.
The Lego workshop participant from the Netherlands wrote on the Dutch Lego forum
the following:
- infrared control;
- rechargeable battery;
- track the same as current, maybe curves with bigger radius;
- stepless speedcontrol from new remote;
- new PF is already in preproduction fase;
- cables not attached to motors;
- seperate receivers;
- multiple channel receivers i.e. lights can be controlled independant from
speed.
OK, I accepted that I had to stock up on 9V track (which I did) but silently
hoped for a radiocontrolled remote. I already use the IR remote with my track
powered motors, which is great fun, but after a few meters it does not respond
anymore... So not much good news accept for the compatibility and maybe the
bigger curves!.... but still all plastic.
greetings from Amsterdam!
Remko
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: LEGO 9V Train Communication II
|
| Hi all, well, I'm not particularly fond of the IR remote controller as well - I spent a significant amount of money on 9V stuff (the original w/ metal tracks) and hope to keep that in a usable state for some time. The good part is that the plastic (...) (17 years ago, 15-Dec-07, to lugnet.trains)
| | | Re: LEGO 9V Train Communication II
|
| (...) One interesting possibility is an IR remote that does not have to have a constant signal to work. In other words, have the remote send commands that change the state of the train, but not need to continuously send a "go forward" command or (...) (17 years ago, 15-Dec-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LEGO 9V Train Communication II
|
| If they are still using IR (i.e. line of sight) for communications, forget it. If they go to some kind of non line of sight control (e.g. whatever the Fischer-Price GeoTrax system is using), I will consider it. (17 years ago, 8-Dec-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
