Subject:
|
Re: I have a dream...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:10:40 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
cjmasi@*nogarbageplease+Spamcake+*verizon.net
|
Viewed:
|
3361 times
|
| |
|
|
Didier Enjary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Guess what I’m about to talk... : 6wide vs 8wide! no trolling inside :-)
>
> I was reading Jeramy’s blog and more precisely this post :
>
> http://indylug.org/blogs/jeramy_spurgeon/archive/2006/11/02/The-Great-LEGO_AE00_-Train-Width-Debate.aspx
[...]
> But I digress and what I want to underline is that sentence :
>
> "We (the train builders group) decided from the beginning to keep the trains we
> built in scale with what LEGO had already produced in the past, which was, for
> the most part, 6 wide trains."
[...]
> Didier
I'd like to add, that we made certain that 8-wide trains could be built
using 10183. There are enough black plates (4xN and 2xN) and black 2x8
technic plates to built a decent sized 8-wide base. Also, one builder
did build an 8-wide model, and ironically, it was not built by either of
the 8-widers. The 8-wide model didn't make it onto the box though.
It really is a cool set that has a lot of possibilities in addition to
the featured models.
Chris
--
http://mysite.verizon.net/cjmasi/lego/
Learn about brittle bone disease
http://www.oif.org/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | I have a dream...
|
| Hi, Guess what I’m about to talk... : 6wide vs 8wide! no trolling inside :-) I was reading Jeramy’s blog and more precisely this post : (URL) could say the post by Jeramy is nothing really new on the 6vs8 debate. I don’t agree, for instance the (...) (18 years ago, 7-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
