Subject:
|
Re: New TLC standard for containers?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Sat, 23 Dec 2006 19:24:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3401 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Timothy Gould wrote:
| |
It’s such an unappealling aspect ratio.
|
Could be because it is just off of the golden mean: 3:2
| |
6x12 would match the old ones better
but I’d be more inclined to 6x14 or 6x16. 6x10 just looks nothing like a real
container (half or full).
|
Speaking of the containers-- is that a new element on them; a 1x5x6 thin
wall-type thing?
JOHN
|
|
Message has 5 Replies:
 | | Re: New TLC standard for containers?
|
| (...) Could well be. Also looks like a new bigger boat hull - AFAIK the largest to date is (URL) this> (besides the (URL) Belville one>), and this looks considerably larger than that - at least 16 wide, and by my count at least 70 long. ROSCO (18 years ago, 23-Dec-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
| | | Re: New TLC standard for containers?
|
| (...) Welll yes and no. Indeed it's a new element from Lego however megablox has had that element for a while. In the megajunk version they used it as a translucent window. This new "now Lego" element opens doors too much lighter models especially (...) (18 years ago, 24-Dec-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New TLC standard for containers?
|
| (...) It's such an unappealling aspect ratio. 6x12 would match the old ones better but I'd be more inclined to 6x14 or 6x16. 6x10 just looks nothing like a real container (half or full). Tim (18 years ago, 23-Dec-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
