Subject:
|
Re: New TLC standard for containers?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Sat, 23 Dec 2006 19:53:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2929 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.trains, Timothy Gould wrote:
| |
It’s such an unappealling aspect ratio.
|
Could be because it is just off of the golden mean: 3:2
| |
6x12 would match the old ones better
but I’d be more inclined to 6x14 or 6x16. 6x10 just looks nothing like a
real container (half or full).
|
Speaking of the containers-- is that a new element on them; a 1x5x6 thin
wall-type thing?
|
Could well be. Also looks like a new bigger boat hull - AFAIK the largest to
date is this (besides the
Belville one), and this looks
considerably larger than that - at least 16 wide, and by my count at least 70
long.
ROSCO
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New TLC standard for containers?
|
| (...) Could be because it is just off of the golden mean: 3:2 (...) Speaking of the containers-- is that a new element on them; a 1x5x6 thin wall-type thing? JOHN (18 years ago, 23-Dec-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
