Geeking : 5161


Off-Topic / Geek / 5161	5160 \| 5162

Subject:	Re: New TLC standard for containers?
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.geek
Date:	Sat, 23 Dec 2006 21:59:18 GMT
Viewed:	3544 times

In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Timothy Gould wrote:

In lugnet.trains, John Neal wrote:

In lugnet.trains, Timothy Gould wrote:

It’s such an unappealling aspect ratio.

Could be because it is just off of the golden mean: 3:2

actually 10:6 = 5:3 = 1.66 is closer to the golden mean (1.618...) than 3:2 = 1.5 ;)

I don’t know what I was thinking when I wrote 3:2. I meant that 6:10 is just off the golden ratio of 6:9.7...

Though I was confused there, you make the case that the aspect ratio is actually a pleasant one, as opposed to your initial assertion...

JOHN

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: New TLC standard for containers?
(...) No doubt it's pleasant but it's a shipping container so it should be practical and is this unappealling ;) Tim (18 years ago, 23-Dec-06, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: New TLC standard for containers?
(...) actually 10:6 = 5:3 = 1.66 is closer to the golden mean (1.618...) than 3:2 = 1.5 ;) (...) Moved to .o-t.geek (18 years ago, 23-Dec-06, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)

14 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search