Subject:
|
Re: New TLC standard for containers?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Sat, 23 Dec 2006 19:51:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3531 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.trains, Timothy Gould wrote:
| |
It’s such an unappealling aspect ratio.
|
Could be because it is just off of the golden mean: 3:2
|
actually 10:6 = 5:3 = 1.66 is closer to the golden mean (1.618...) than 3:2 =
1.5 ;)
Moved to .o-t.geek
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New TLC standard for containers?
|
| (...) I don't know what I was thinking when I wrote 3:2. I meant that 6:10 is just off the golden ratio of 6:9.7... Though I was confused there, you make the case that the aspect ratio is actually a pleasant one, as opposed to your initial (...) (18 years ago, 23-Dec-06, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New TLC standard for containers?
|
| (...) Could be because it is just off of the golden mean: 3:2 (...) Speaking of the containers-- is that a new element on them; a 1x5x6 thin wall-type thing? JOHN (18 years ago, 23-Dec-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
