Subject:
|
Re: Compressionism (D&RGW coach set)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Wed, 6 Apr 2005 02:18:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
6814 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.trains, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
| |
In lugnet.trains, John Neal wrote:
| |
I know what you mean. When I see a fine compressed train, as in a James
Mathis creation, the word that comes to my mind is “cute”.
|
Funny, when I see a fine looking (when on static display) 8 wide model on a
curve, even a curve/straight/curve curve, the word that comes to mind is
“ridiculous”.
|
That’s interesting. I’ve never had the wonky weave problem. Perhaps it is
because we go curve-straight-curve-straight (never 2 curves together).
|
Sorry, that’s what I meant, apologies if that wasn’t clear.
Steve’s right though, you need to stop hassling people about their desires (and
they need to stop hassling you about yours)...
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Compressionism (D&RGW coach set)
|
| (...) That's interesting. I've never had the wonky weave problem. Perhaps it is because we go curve-straight-curve-straight (never 2 curves together). (...) Yeah, and bats will fly out of my butt! (...) <shrug> We build to run as well. And you will (...) (20 years ago, 31-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
61 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
