Subject:
|
Re: Compressionism (D&RGW coach set)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Thu, 31 Mar 2005 12:47:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
6364 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
| |
In lugnet.trains, John Neal wrote:
| |
I know what you mean. When I see a fine compressed train, as in a James
Mathis creation, the word that comes to my mind is “cute”.
|
Funny, when I see a fine looking (when on static display) 8 wide model on a
curve, even a curve/straight/curve curve, the word that comes to mind is
“ridiculous”. If and when LEGO ever makes decent radii, I might switch. But
till then, no. I build my models to operate. (that they sometimes have issues
is a different matter, I’m not too proud...)
|
Too bad YOU don’t care enough to take up the challenge presented by those
articulations ;-)
| |
| |
lol none taken. I realize that many people still love the cuteness of 6
wide trains and fear the big, bad 8 wides;-) To each his own.
|
Oh, get over yourself. Mobody fears you. Or your models. :-)
|
I’m sure he’s talking about 8-wides in general. Like, I dunno, not just his....
Also, while we’re at it, you misspelled ‘nobody’ ;-P
I think my next .admin.suggestions post should be regarding the addition of a
butt-smack button.
:-P
Legoswami
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Compressionism (D&RGW coach set)
|
| (...) Funny, when I see a fine looking (when on static display) 8 wide model on a curve, even a curve/straight/curve curve, the word that comes to mind is "ridiculous". If and when LEGO ever makes decent radii, I might switch. But till then, no. I (...) (20 years ago, 31-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
61 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
