Subject:
|
Re: A brief reflexion on power sources
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Thu, 24 Jul 2003 15:49:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1399 times
|
| |
 | |
"Pedro Silva" wrote:
> Plus, under this line of thinking, the introduction of DCC by LEGO would become
> a much natural step for the consumer - "I now have too many trains to control,
> so now I must get myself a new control-system"... ;-)
What would be really nice is if Lego built train motors that
accepted the plug-in style DCC decoders. The motors would
ship with a dummy plug that merely routed power from the track
to the motor and headlight connector. When you want to
upgrade to DCC, all you do is remove the plug and drop in the
decoder of your choice.
Mark
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:  | | Re: A brief reflexion on power sources
|
| (...) So, if I understand you correctly, the "new" motor would consist of two parts: -Part A, motor and headlight connector (already attached to wheels?) -Interchangable parts B and C, one being that dummy plug you mention (default in every (...) (22 years ago, 24-Jul-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | A brief reflexion on power sources
|
| Hi all, When browsing Brickshelf's catalog database tonight, I came across this text from the 1969 belgian catalog: (URL) simple terms, it states something that appeared obvious back then: a child would first own a pushtrain, then a battery-operated (...) (22 years ago, 23-Jul-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:                     
    
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|